Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
SCHKvsBWVTFETF Comparison
Schwab 1000 Index® ETF (SCHK) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. iPath CBOE S&P 500 BuyWrite Index ETN (BWVTF) is part of the Options Strategies segment. SCHK's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Financials and Communication Services. In contrast, BWVTF's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. SCHK is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.03%, versus 0.75% for BWVTF. SCHK is down -2.31% year-to-date (YTD) with +$51M in YTD flows. BWVTF performs better with 0.1% YTD performance, and - in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of SCHK and BWVTF below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
SCHK vs BWVTF performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | SCHK BWVTF | -2.37%-0.56% | -2.15%+1.36% | -2.31%+0.10% | +20.41%+13.87% | +78.99%+45.20% | +73.99%+49.00% |
| Flows | SCHK BWVTF | +$47M- | +$81M- | +$51M- | +$261M-$715K | +$495M-$900K | +$1.50B-$1M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | SCHK BWVTF | +12.02%+8.08% | +18.81%+15.18% | +15.19%+11.14% | +17.28%+12.23% |
| Max drawdown | SCHK BWVTF | -4.42%-2.38% | -13.99%-11.76% | -19.22%-16.79% | -25.35%-19.88% |
| Max drawdown duration | SCHK BWVTF | 44d14d | 45d91d | 126d240d | 716d686d |
SCHK | BWVTF | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 3:01 PM | $31.97 | |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $32.03 | |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
SCHK | BWVTF | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
SCHK | BWVTF | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $31.97 | – |
| 1D performance | -0.19% | – |
| AuM | $4.80 B | $1.54 M |
| E/R | 0.03% | 0.75% |
SCHK | BWVTF | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Schwab ETFs | Barclays |
| Benchmark | Schwab 1000 Index | CBOE S&P 500 BuyWrite Index |
| N° of holdings | 834 | 479 |
| Asset class | Equities | Alternative |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | November 10, 2017 | May 22, 2007 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the SCHK and BWVTF ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, SCHK is down -2.31% year-to-date (YTD), while BWVTF has returned 0.1%. That puts BWVTF better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: SCHK or BWVTF?
Year-to-date, the SCHK ETF saw +$51M in flows, compared to - for BWVTF.
Which ETF is more volatile: SCHK or BWVTF?
Over the past year, SCHK had a volatility of 18.81%, while BWVTF experienced 15.18%.
Which ETF is bigger: SCHK or BWVTF?
As of March 12, 2026, SCHK holds $4.80 B in assets under management (AUM), while BWVTF manages $1.54 M.
What sectors do the SCHK and BWVTF ETFs invest in?
SCHK leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Financials and Communication Services. Meanwhile, BWVTF focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the SCHK ETF and BWVTF ETF?
SCHK top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. BWVTF holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: SCHK or BWVTF?
SCHK holds 911 securities with 42.31% of its assets in the top 15. BWVTF has 503 securities and a top 15 weight of 44.54%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
