Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
SCHFvsGSIDETF Comparison
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF
Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) and Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF (GSID) belong to the same industry segment: DM Large & Mid Cap. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Financials, Industrials and Information Technology. SCHF is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.03%, versus 0.25% for GSID. SCHF is up 3.91% year-to-date (YTD) with +$862M in YTD flows. GSID performs worse with 3.03% YTD performance, and -$80M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of SCHF and GSID below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
SCHF vs GSID performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | SCHF GSID | -5.47%-5.31% | +5.58%+4.36% | +3.91%+3.03% | +29.79%+25.11% | +64.42%+58.79% | +55.52%+51.18% |
| Flows | SCHF GSID | +$486M- | +$2.35B-$87M | +$862M-$80M | +$3.76B-$100M | +$11.19B+$218M | +$18.82B+$321M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | SCHF GSID | +15.20%+14.35% | +15.58%+16.12% | +13.40%+13.78% | +14.45%+15.13% |
| Max drawdown | SCHF GSID | -8.50%-8.10% | -13.56%-14.37% | -13.58%-14.37% | -28.95%-29.33% |
| Max drawdown duration | SCHF GSID | 11d10d | 41d42d | 211d42d | 897d897d |
SCHF | GSID | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 3:07 PM | $24.79 | $70.52 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $24.88 | $70.57 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
SCHF | GSID | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
SCHF | GSID | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $24.79 | $70.52 |
| 1D performance | -0.36% | -0.07% |
| AuM | $58.37 B | $907.97 M |
| E/R | 0.03% | 0.25% |
SCHF | GSID | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Schwab ETFs | Goldman Sachs |
| Benchmark | FTSE Developed ex US Index | Solactive GBS Developed Markets ex North America Large & Mid cap Index |
| N° of holdings | 1360 | 841 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | November 3, 2009 | May 12, 2020 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the SCHF and GSID ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, SCHF is up 3.91% year-to-date (YTD), while GSID has returned 3.03%. That puts SCHF better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: SCHF or GSID?
Year-to-date, the SCHF ETF saw +$862M in flows, compared to -$80M for GSID.
Which ETF is more volatile: SCHF or GSID?
Over the past year, SCHF had a volatility of 15.58%, while GSID experienced 16.12%.
Which ETF is bigger: SCHF or GSID?
As of March 12, 2026, SCHF holds $58.37 B in assets under management (AUM), while GSID manages $907.97 M.
What sectors do the SCHF and GSID ETFs invest in?
SCHF leans toward sectors like Financials, Industrials and Information Technology. Meanwhile, GSID focuses on Financials, Industrials and Information Technology.
What are the top holdings of the SCHF ETF and GSID ETF?
SCHF top holdings include ASML HOLDING, SAMSUNG ELECTR and ROCHE. GSID holds in its top three: ASML HOLDING, ROCHE and HSBC HOLDINGS.
Which ETF is more diversified: SCHF or GSID?
SCHF holds 1431 securities with 15.85% of its assets in the top 15. GSID has 889 securities and a top 15 weight of 17.33%.
Should you add international equities to your investment portfolio?
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
