Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
SCDVvsNBSMETF Comparison
Bahl & Gaynor Small Cap Dividend ETF (SCDV) belongs to the US High Dividend segment. Neuberger Berman Small-Mid Cap ETF (NBSM) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. SCDV's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Health Care and Financials. In contrast, NBSM's top sector exposures are Industrials, Information Technology and Financials. SCDV is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.7%, versus 0.75% for NBSM. SCDV is up 5.39% year-to-date (YTD) with +$5M in YTD flows. NBSM performs worse with 1.95% YTD performance, and +$12M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of SCDV and NBSM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
SCDV vs NBSM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | SCDV NBSM | -8.02%-6.24% | +4.71%-0.98% | +5.39%+1.95% | +19.97%+8.01% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | SCDV NBSM | +$3M+$10M | +$7M+$21M | +$5M+$12M | +$22M-$3M | -- | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | SCDV NBSM | +14.89%+14.08% | +18.61%+19.64% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | SCDV NBSM | -8.40%-6.24% | -12.33%-14.07% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | SCDV NBSM | 19d28d | 44d46d | n/an/a | n/an/a |
SCDV | NBSM | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $25.14 | $25.21 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $25.25 | $25.20 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
SCDV | NBSM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $25.14 | $25.21 |
| 1D performance | -0.46% | +0.04% |
| AuM | $135.55 M | $215.07 M |
| E/R | 0.7% | 0.75% |
SCDV | NBSM | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Bahl & Gaynor | Neuberger Berman |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 33 | 65 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 12, 2024 | March 21, 2024 |
| ESG | No | Yes |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the SCDV and NBSM ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 13, 2026, SCDV is up 5.39% year-to-date (YTD), while NBSM has returned 1.95%. That puts SCDV better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: SCDV or NBSM?
Year-to-date, the SCDV ETF saw +$5M in flows, compared to +$12M for NBSM.
Which ETF is more volatile: SCDV or NBSM?
Over the past year, SCDV had a volatility of 18.61%, while NBSM experienced 19.64%.
Which ETF is bigger: SCDV or NBSM?
As of March 13, 2026, SCDV holds $135.55 M in assets under management (AUM), while NBSM manages $215.07 M.
What sectors do the SCDV and NBSM ETFs invest in?
SCDV leans toward sectors like Industrials, Health Care and Financials. Meanwhile, NBSM focuses on Industrials, Information Technology and Financials.
What are the top holdings of the SCDV ETF and NBSM ETF?
SCDV top holdings include ENSIGN GROUP, GILDAN ACTIVEWEAR and CURTISS WRIGHT. NBSM holds in its top three: VALMONT INDUSTRS, LITTELFUSE and ARCOSA INC.
Which ETF is more diversified: SCDV or NBSM?
SCDV holds 35 securities with 67.55% of its assets in the top 15. NBSM has 65 securities and a top 15 weight of 31.3%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
