Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
SCDVvsISCGETF Comparison
Bahl & Gaynor Small Cap Dividend ETF (SCDV) belongs to the US High Dividend segment. iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF (ISCG) is part of the US Small Cap Growth segment. SCDV's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Health Care and Financials. In contrast, ISCG's top sector exposures are Industrials, Information Technology and Health Care. SCDV is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.7%, versus 0.06% for ISCG. SCDV is up 5.39% year-to-date (YTD) with +$5M in YTD flows. ISCG performs worse with -1.09% YTD performance, and +$67M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of SCDV and ISCG below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
SCDV vs ISCG performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | SCDV ISCG | -8.02%-6.00% | +4.71%-1.93% | +5.39%-1.09% | +19.97%+24.32% | n/a+51.36% | n/a+7.48% |
| Flows | SCDV ISCG | +$3M+$15M | +$7M+$67M | +$5M+$67M | +$22M+$122M | -+$262M | --$19M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | SCDV ISCG | +14.89%+17.95% | +18.61%+22.95% | n/a+20.16% | n/a+23.07% |
| Max drawdown | SCDV ISCG | -8.40%-8.25% | -12.33%-16.30% | n/a-26.39% | n/a-37.91% |
| Max drawdown duration | SCDV ISCG | 19d50d | 44d46d | n/a275d | n/a1096d |
SCDV | ISCG | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $25.14 | $54.96 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $25.25 | $55.07 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
SCDV | ISCG | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
SCDV | ISCG | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $25.14 | $54.96 |
| 1D performance | -0.46% | -0.20% |
| AuM | $135.55 M | $862.22 M |
| E/R | 0.7% | 0.06% |
SCDV | ISCG | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Bahl & Gaynor | iShares |
| Benchmark | - | Morningstar US Small Cap Broad Growth Extended Index |
| N° of holdings | 33 | 832 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 12, 2024 | June 28, 2004 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the SCDV and ISCG ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 13, 2026, SCDV is up 5.39% year-to-date (YTD), while ISCG has lost -1.09%. That puts SCDV better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: SCDV or ISCG?
Year-to-date, the SCDV ETF saw +$5M in flows, compared to +$67M for ISCG.
Which ETF is more volatile: SCDV or ISCG?
Over the past year, SCDV had a volatility of 18.61%, while ISCG experienced 22.95%.
Which ETF is bigger: SCDV or ISCG?
As of March 13, 2026, SCDV holds $135.55 M in assets under management (AUM), while ISCG manages $862.22 M.
What sectors do the SCDV and ISCG ETFs invest in?
SCDV leans toward sectors like Industrials, Health Care and Financials. Meanwhile, ISCG focuses on Industrials, Information Technology and Health Care.
What are the top holdings of the SCDV ETF and ISCG ETF?
SCDV top holdings include ENSIGN GROUP, GILDAN ACTIVEWEAR and CURTISS WRIGHT. ISCG holds in its top three: LUMENTUM HOLDINGS, KRATOS DEFENSE AND SECURITY SOLS and ATI INC.
Which ETF is more diversified: SCDV or ISCG?
SCDV holds 35 securities with 67.55% of its assets in the top 15. ISCG has 969 securities and a top 15 weight of 7.95%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
