SCDVvsFFSMETF Comparison
VS
Bahl & Gaynor Small Cap Dividend ETF (SCDV) belongs to the US High Dividend segment. Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF (FFSM) is part of the Global Blended Cap segment. SCDV's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Finance and Healthcare. In contrast, FFSM's top sector exposures are Finance, Industrials and Technology. SCDV is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.7%, versus 0.43% for FFSM. SCDV is up 15.13% year-to-date (YTD) with +$10M in YTD flows. FFSM performs better with 19.08% YTD performance, and +$342M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of SCDV and FFSM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
SCDV vs FFSM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/30/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | SCDV FFSM | -1.05%-4.02% | +3.50%+2.53% | +15.13%+19.08% | +14.75%+31.31% | n/a+63.46% | n/a+64.19% |
| Flows | SCDV FFSM | +$2M+$134M | +$4M+$161M | +$10M+$342M | +$21M+$500M | -+$1.17B | -+$1.18B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | SCDV FFSM | +15.90%+18.99% | +15.71%+18.72% | n/a+19.26% | n/a+20.61% |
| Max drawdown | SCDV FFSM | -4.35%-5.57% | -11.51%-10.43% | n/a-24.54% | n/a-26.71% |
| Max drawdown duration | SCDV FFSM | 22d35d | 121d43d | n/a283d | n/a828d |
Trading data
SCDV | FFSM | |
Last sale 7/31/2026 at 1:30 PM | $27.64 | $36.74 |
| Previous close 07/30/2026 | $27.41 | $36.55 |
| Consolidated volume 07/30/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/31/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
SCDV | FFSM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $27.64 | $36.74 |
| 1D performance | +0.86% | +0.52% |
| AuM | $153.87 M | $1.48 B |
| E/R | 0.7% | 0.43% |
Characteristics
SCDV | FFSM | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Bahl & Gaynor | Fidelity |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 36 | 1072 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 12, 2024 | February 4, 2021 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
SCDV
USA
90.8%
Other
9.2%
FFSM
USA
95.23%
Other
4.77%
Sectors
SCDV
Industrials
32.29%
Finance
17.87%
Healthcare
15.25%
Technology
11.01%
Other
23.58%
FFSM
Finance
19.17%
Industrials
18.27%
Technology
17.37%
Non-Energy Materi.
10.62%
Healthcare
10.02%
Consumer Cyclical.
9.34%
Other
15.22%
Advertisement
Diversification
SCDV
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
67.91%
FFSM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
21.78%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
SCDV
The Ensign Group, Inc.
7.54%
Curtiss-Wright Corp.
6.33%
Enpro, Inc.
6.00%
Federal Signal Corp.
5.14%
Chemed Corp.
4.76%
Silicon Motion Technology Corp.
4.57%
American Healthcare REIT, Inc.
4.54%
Gildan Activewear, Inc.
4.52%
Littelfuse, Inc.
4.46%
Victory Capital Holdings, Inc.
4.28%
Evercore, Inc.
3.79%
Texas Roadhouse, Inc.
3.33%
BWX Technologies, Inc.
3.12%
Chesapeake Utilities Corp.
2.77%
Balchem Corp.
2.76%
FFSM
Coherent Corp.
1.80%
ATI, Inc.
1.67%
IES Holdings, Inc.
1.66%
TD SYNNEX Corp.
1.65%
Performance Food Group Co.
1.50%
SPX Technologies, Inc.
1.45%
Advanced Energy Industries, Inc.
1.40%
Seagate Technology Holdings Plc
1.39%
Element Solutions, Inc.
1.37%
US Foods Holding Corp.
1.36%
Fabrinet
1.36%
Crocs, Inc.
1.32%
FirstCash Holdings, Inc.
1.30%
Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.
1.28%
Murphy USA, Inc.
1.26%
Frequently asked questions about SCDV and FFSM
How have the SCDV and FFSM ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 30, 2026, SCDV is up 15.13% year-to-date (YTD), while FFSM has returned 19.08%. That puts FFSM better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: SCDV or FFSM?
Year-to-date, the SCDV ETF saw +$10M in flows, compared to +$342M for FFSM.
Which ETF is more volatile: SCDV or FFSM?
Over the past year, SCDV had a volatility of 15.71%, while FFSM experienced 18.72%.
Which ETF is bigger: SCDV or FFSM?
As of July 30, 2026, SCDV holds $153.87 M in assets under management (AUM), while FFSM manages $1.48 B.
What sectors do the SCDV and FFSM ETFs invest in?
SCDV leans toward sectors like Industrials, Finance and Healthcare. Meanwhile, FFSM focuses on Finance, Industrials and Technology.
What are the top holdings of the SCDV ETF and FFSM ETF?
SCDV top holdings include The Ensign Group, Inc., Curtiss-Wright Corp. and Enpro, Inc.. FFSM holds in its top three: Coherent Corp., ATI, Inc. and IES Holdings, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: SCDV or FFSM?
SCDV holds 38 securities with 67.91% of its assets in the top 15. FFSM has 1074 securities and a top 15 weight of 21.78%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
