Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
SCDVvsCSMDETF Comparison
Bahl & Gaynor Small Cap Dividend ETF (SCDV) belongs to the US High Dividend segment. Congress SMid Growth ETF (CSMD) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. SCDV's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Health Care and Financials. In contrast, CSMD's top sector exposures are Industrials, Health Care and Information Technology. SCDV is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.7%, versus 0.9% for CSMD. SCDV is up 5.39% year-to-date (YTD) with +$5M in YTD flows. CSMD performs worse with -0.8% YTD performance, and +$7M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of SCDV and CSMD below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
SCDV vs CSMD performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | SCDV CSMD | -8.02%-7.01% | +4.71%-1.88% | +5.39%-0.80% | +19.97%+16.13% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | SCDV CSMD | +$3M-$20M | +$7M+$20M | +$5M+$7M | +$22M+$128M | -- | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | SCDV CSMD | +14.89%+18.73% | +18.61%+22.08% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | SCDV CSMD | -8.40%-9.98% | -12.33%-13.31% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | SCDV CSMD | 19d50d | 44d38d | n/an/a | n/an/a |
SCDV | CSMD | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $25.14 | $31.33 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $25.25 | $31.53 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
SCDV | CSMD | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $25.14 | $31.33 |
| 1D performance | -0.46% | -0.62% |
| AuM | $135.55 M | $410.19 M |
| E/R | 0.7% | 0.9% |
SCDV | CSMD | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Bahl & Gaynor | Congress Asset Management |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 33 | 41 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 12, 2024 | August 22, 2023 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the SCDV and CSMD ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 13, 2026, SCDV is up 5.39% year-to-date (YTD), while CSMD has lost -0.8%. That puts SCDV better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: SCDV or CSMD?
Year-to-date, the SCDV ETF saw +$5M in flows, compared to +$7M for CSMD.
Which ETF is more volatile: SCDV or CSMD?
Over the past year, SCDV had a volatility of 18.61%, while CSMD experienced 22.08%.
Which ETF is bigger: SCDV or CSMD?
As of March 13, 2026, SCDV holds $135.55 M in assets under management (AUM), while CSMD manages $410.19 M.
What sectors do the SCDV and CSMD ETFs invest in?
SCDV leans toward sectors like Industrials, Health Care and Financials. Meanwhile, CSMD focuses on Industrials, Health Care and Information Technology.
What are the top holdings of the SCDV ETF and CSMD ETF?
SCDV top holdings include ENSIGN GROUP, GILDAN ACTIVEWEAR and CURTISS WRIGHT. CSMD holds in its top three: CURTISS WRIGHT, STERLING INFRASTRUCTURE INC and COMFORT SYSTEMS USA.
Which ETF is more diversified: SCDV or CSMD?
SCDV holds 35 securities with 67.55% of its assets in the top 15. CSMD has 42 securities and a top 15 weight of 51.02%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
