SCDSvsVTWOETF Comparison
VS
JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF (SCDS) and Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF (VTWO) belong to the same industry segment: US Small Cap. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Finance, Healthcare and Technology. SCDS is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.4%, versus 0.06% for VTWO. SCDS is up 22.75% year-to-date (YTD) with +$752K in YTD flows. VTWO performs worse with 17.46% YTD performance, and +$839M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of SCDS and VTWO below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
SCDS vs VTWO performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/10/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | SCDS VTWO | -4.32%-4.05% | +1.79%+2.29% | +22.75%+17.46% | +26.76%+23.13% | n/a+62.51% | n/a+39.35% |
| Flows | SCDS VTWO | +$759K+$328M | +$757K+$279M | +$752K+$839M | +$757K+$1.67B | -+$5.31B | -+$6.81B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | SCDS VTWO | +14.37%+15.10% | +17.71%+18.91% | n/a+21.14% | n/a+22.46% |
| Max drawdown | SCDS VTWO | -5.87%-5.66% | -8.90%-10.99% | n/a-27.51% | n/a-31.93% |
| Max drawdown duration | SCDS VTWO | 25d25d | 78d82d | n/a289d | n/a1093d |
Trading data
SCDS | VTWO | |
Last sale 9/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $73.87 | $116.76 |
| Previous close 09/10/2026 | $73.39 | $116.34 |
| Consolidated volume 09/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
SCDS
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexSCDS | VTWO | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/11/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
SCDS | VTWO | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $73.87 | $116.76 |
| 1D performance | +0.66% | +0.36% |
| AuM | $9.55 M | $16.98 B |
| E/R | 0.4% | 0.06% |
Characteristics
SCDS | VTWO | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | Vanguard |
| Benchmark | - | Russell 2000 Index |
| N° of holdings | 270 | 1968 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | August 7, 2024 | September 20, 2010 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
SCDS
USA
94.75%
Other
5.25%
VTWO
USA
92.69%
Other
7.31%
Sectors
SCDS
Finance
26.53%
Healthcare
17.81%
Technology
13.96%
Industrials
10.55%
Other
31.16%
VTWO
Finance
26.17%
Healthcare
19.29%
Technology
11.7%
Industrials
10.34%
Other
32.49%
Advertisement
Diversification
SCDS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
13.4%
VTWO
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
4.51%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
SCDS
Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc.
1.13%
Moog, Inc.
1.04%
The Chefs' Warehouse, Inc.
0.98%
WSFS Financial Corp.
0.97%
AZZ, Inc.
0.95%
Life Time Group Holdings, Inc.
0.95%
Monarch Casino & Resort, Inc.
0.90%
Enova International, Inc.
0.86%
Knowles Corp.
0.85%
MYR Group, Inc.
0.82%
Kite Realty Group Trust
0.82%
First Financial Bancorp (Ohio)
0.80%
Perimeter Solutions, Inc.
0.78%
First Interstate BancSystem, Inc.
0.78%
Rush Enterprises, Inc.
0.77%
VTWO
Moog, Inc.
0.35%
Hut 8 Corp.
0.35%
UMB Financial Corp.
0.34%
Cytokinetics, Inc.
0.32%
ViaSat, Inc.
0.31%
BrightSpring Health Services, Inc.
0.31%
Glaukos Corp.
0.30%
CareTrust REIT, Inc.
0.30%
Old National Bancorp
0.29%
Brinker International, Inc.
0.29%
Krystal Biotech, Inc.
0.28%
JFrog Ltd.
0.27%
Crinetics Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
0.27%
HealthEquity, Inc.
0.27%
Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc.
0.26%
Frequently asked questions about SCDS and VTWO
How have the SCDS and VTWO ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 10, 2026, SCDS is up 22.75% year-to-date (YTD), while VTWO has returned 17.46%. That puts SCDS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: SCDS or VTWO?
Year-to-date, the SCDS ETF saw +$752K in flows, compared to +$839M for VTWO.
Which ETF is more volatile: SCDS or VTWO?
Over the past year, SCDS had a volatility of 17.71%, while VTWO experienced 18.91%.
Which ETF is bigger: SCDS or VTWO?
As of September 10, 2026, SCDS holds $9.55 M in assets under management (AUM), while VTWO manages $16.98 B.
What sectors do the SCDS and VTWO ETFs invest in?
SCDS leans toward sectors like Finance, Healthcare and Technology. Meanwhile, VTWO focuses on Finance, Healthcare and Technology.
What are the top holdings of the SCDS ETF and VTWO ETF?
SCDS top holdings include Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc., Moog, Inc. and The Chefs' Warehouse, Inc.. VTWO holds in its top three: Moog, Inc., Hut 8 Corp. and UMB Financial Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: SCDS or VTWO?
SCDS holds 270 securities with 13.4% of its assets in the top 15. VTWO has 1986 securities and a top 15 weight of 4.51%.
Advertisement
Latest news about SCDS & VTWO
Will 2024 be the Year of Small Caps and Value Stocks?
July 29, 2024
VTWO
Value ETFs Shine Amid Lower-Than-Expected Inflation
July 15, 2024
VTWO
Advertisement
Advertisement
