Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
SCDSvsRYLGETF Comparison
Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call & Growth ETF
JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF (SCDS) belongs to the US Small Cap segment. Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call & Growth ETF (RYLG) is part of the Options Strategies segment. SCDS's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Financials and Information Technology. In contrast, RYLG's top sector exposures are Industrials, Health Care and Financials. SCDS is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.4%, versus 0.35% for RYLG. SCDS is up 3.22% year-to-date (YTD) with -$4K in YTD flows. RYLG performs worse with 2.42% YTD performance, and -$234K in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of SCDS and RYLG below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
SCDS vs RYLG performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | SCDS RYLG | -4.94%-3.24% | +0.47%+1.15% | +3.22%+2.42% | +23.81%+20.81% | n/a+35.15% | n/an/a |
| Flows | SCDS RYLG | -$4K- | -$4K-$234K | -$4K-$234K | -$17K+$208K | -+$5M | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | SCDS RYLG | +16.74%+14.70% | +22.11%+19.57% | n/a+16.92% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | SCDS RYLG | -6.25%-4.70% | -16.31%-15.02% | n/a-22.43% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | SCDS RYLG | 47d12d | 52d74d | n/a296d | n/an/a |
SCDS | RYLG | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $61.85 | $22.38 |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $61.91 | $22.35 |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
SCDS | RYLG | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
SCDS | RYLG | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $61.85 | $22.38 |
| 1D performance | -0.08% | +0.14% |
| AuM | $7.43 M | $7.84 M |
| E/R | 0.4% | 0.35% |
SCDS | RYLG | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | Global X |
| Benchmark | - | Cboe Russell 2000 Half BuyWrite Index |
| N° of holdings | 236 | 1631 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | August 7, 2024 | October 4, 2022 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the SCDS and RYLG ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, SCDS is up 3.22% year-to-date (YTD), while RYLG has returned 2.42%. That puts SCDS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: SCDS or RYLG?
Year-to-date, the SCDS ETF saw -$4K in flows, compared to -$234K for RYLG.
Which ETF is more volatile: SCDS or RYLG?
Over the past year, SCDS had a volatility of 22.11%, while RYLG experienced 19.57%.
Which ETF is bigger: SCDS or RYLG?
As of March 10, 2026, SCDS holds $7.43 M in assets under management (AUM), while RYLG manages $7.84 M.
What sectors do the SCDS and RYLG ETFs invest in?
SCDS leans toward sectors like Industrials, Financials and Information Technology. Meanwhile, RYLG focuses on Industrials, Health Care and Financials.
What are the top holdings of the SCDS ETF and RYLG ETF?
SCDS top holdings include BLOOM ENERGY CORP, FABRINET and VICOR. RYLG holds in its top three: BLOOM ENERGY CORP, CREDO TECHNOLOGY GROUP HOLDING and KRATOS DEFENSE AND SECURITY SOLS.
Which ETF is more diversified: SCDS or RYLG?
SCDS holds 255 securities with 15.48% of its assets in the top 15. RYLG has 1883 securities and a top 15 weight of 7.8%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
