SCDSvsRSSLETF Comparison
VS
JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF (SCDS) and Global X Russell 2000 ETF (RSSL) belong to the same industry segment: US Small Cap. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Industrials, Information Technology and Financials. SCDS is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.4%, versus 0.08% for RSSL. SCDS is up 23.98% year-to-date (YTD) with -$4K in YTD flows. RSSL performs worse with 18.24% YTD performance, and -$98M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of SCDS and RSSL below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
SCDS vs RSSL performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 06/11/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | SCDS RSSL | +3.40%+1.88% | +20.26%+15.20% | +23.98%+18.24% | +41.60%+37.61% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | SCDS RSSL | -+$2M | --$70M | -$4K-$98M | -$17K-$333M | -- | -- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | SCDS RSSL | +21.21%+22.21% | +18.56%+19.74% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | SCDS RSSL | -4.60%-5.00% | -8.90%-11.01% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | SCDS RSSL | 13d22d | 78d82d | n/an/a | n/an/a |
Trading data
SCDS | RSSL | |
Last sale 6/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $74.33 | $113.95 |
| Previous close 06/11/2026 | $72.38 | $113.58 |
| Consolidated volume 06/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of May 29, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
SCDS
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexSCDS | RSSL | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 6/11/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
SCDS | RSSL | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $74.33 | $113.95 |
| 1D performance | +2.70% | +0.33% |
| AuM | $8.92 M | $1.49 B |
| E/R | 0.4% | 0.08% |
Characteristics
SCDS | RSSL | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | Global X |
| Benchmark | - | Russell 2000 RIC Capped Index |
| N° of holdings | 239 | 1593 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | August 7, 2024 | June 4, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
SCDS
USA
90.57%
Other
9.43%
RSSL
USA
90.52%
Other
9.48%
Sectors
SCDS
Industrials
17.98%
Information Techn.
17.12%
Financials
15.79%
Health Care
12.93%
Consumer Discreti.
9.18%
Other
27.01%
RSSL
Industrials
16.14%
Information Techn.
15.74%
Financials
14.14%
Health Care
13.57%
Consumer Discreti.
8.07%
Other
32.34%
Advertisement
Diversification
SCDS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
17.89%
RSSL
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
8.67%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of April 30, 2026
SCDS
BLOOM ENERGY CORP
1.99%
FABRINET
1.97%
CREDO TECHNOLOGY GROUP HOLDING
1.54%
VICOR
1.36%
TTM TECHNOLOGIES
1.36%
RAMBUS
1.24%
MODINE MNFC CO
1.07%
AZZ
0.99%
DIGITALOCEAN HOLDINGS
0.99%
RYMAN HOSPITALITY PROPERTIES
0.93%
MONARCH CASINO
0.92%
WSFS FINANCIAL
0.92%
US65290E1010
0.89%
PRIMORIS SERVICES
0.89%
MYR GROUP
0.82%
RSSL
BLOOM ENERGY CORP
1.95%
CREDO TECHNOLOGY GROUP HOLDING
0.88%
FABRINET
0.72%
COEUR MINING INC
0.54%
US65290E1010
0.52%
ECHOSTAR
0.50%
IONQ
0.45%
TTM TECHNOLOGIES
0.44%
STERLING INFRASTRUCTURE INC
0.43%
ADVANCED ENERGY INDUSTRIES
0.42%
MODINE MNFC CO
0.38%
RAMBUS
0.37%
SITIME CORP
0.37%
DYCOM INDUSTRIES
0.35%
BRIDGEBIO PHARMA
0.35%
Frequently asked questions about SCDS and RSSL
How have the SCDS and RSSL ETFs performed in 2026?
As of June 11, 2026, SCDS is up 23.98% year-to-date (YTD), while RSSL has returned 18.24%. That puts SCDS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: SCDS or RSSL?
Year-to-date, the SCDS ETF saw -$4K in flows, compared to -$98M for RSSL.
Which ETF is more volatile: SCDS or RSSL?
Over the past year, SCDS had a volatility of 18.56%, while RSSL experienced 19.74%.
Which ETF is bigger: SCDS or RSSL?
As of June 11, 2026, SCDS holds $8.92 M in assets under management (AUM), while RSSL manages $1.49 B.
What sectors do the SCDS and RSSL ETFs invest in?
SCDS leans toward sectors like Industrials, Information Technology and Financials. Meanwhile, RSSL focuses on Industrials, Information Technology and Financials.
What are the top holdings of the SCDS ETF and RSSL ETF?
SCDS top holdings include BLOOM ENERGY CORP, FABRINET and CREDO TECHNOLOGY GROUP HOLDING. RSSL holds in its top three: BLOOM ENERGY CORP, CREDO TECHNOLOGY GROUP HOLDING and FABRINET.
Which ETF is more diversified: SCDS or RSSL?
SCDS holds 259 securities with 17.89% of its assets in the top 15. RSSL has 1890 securities and a top 15 weight of 8.67%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
