SCDSvsIWMWETF Comparison
VS
JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF (SCDS) belongs to the US Small Cap segment. iShares Russell 2000 BuyWrite ETF (IWMW) is part of the Options Strategies segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Finance, Healthcare and Technology. SCDS is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.4%, versus 0.39% for IWMW. SCDS is up 23.5% year-to-date (YTD) with +$752K in YTD flows. IWMW performs worse with 13.7% YTD performance, and +$24M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of SCDS and IWMW below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
SCDS vs IWMW performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/11/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | SCDS IWMW | -3.85%-2.56% | -0.38%+4.23% | +23.50%+13.70% | +25.18%+16.20% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | SCDS IWMW | +$759K-$821K | +$757K+$7M | +$752K+$24M | +$757K+$33M | -- | -- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | SCDS IWMW | +13.28%+9.84% | +17.62%+12.34% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | SCDS IWMW | -5.87%-3.79% | -8.90%-6.92% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | SCDS IWMW | 26d26d | 78d62d | n/an/a | n/an/a |
Trading data
SCDS | IWMW | |
Last sale 9/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $73.87 | $38.48 |
| Previous close 09/10/2026 | $73.39 | $38.52 |
| Consolidated volume 09/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
SCDS
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexSCDS | IWMW | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/11/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
SCDS | IWMW | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $73.87 | $38.48 |
| 1D performance | +0.66% | -0.10% |
| AuM | $9.60 M | $58.07 M |
| E/R | 0.4% | 0.39% |
Characteristics
SCDS | IWMW | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | iShares |
| Benchmark | - | Cboe FTSE Russell IWM 2% OTM BuyWrite Index |
| N° of holdings | 270 | 1945 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | August 7, 2024 | March 14, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
SCDS
USA
94.75%
Other
5.25%
IWMW
USA
96.06%
Other
3.94%
Sectors
SCDS
Finance
26.53%
Healthcare
17.81%
Technology
13.96%
Industrials
10.55%
Other
31.16%
IWMW
Finance
26.88%
Healthcare
20.29%
Technology
11.87%
Industrials
10.58%
Other
30.37%
Advertisement
Diversification
SCDS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
13.4%
IWMW
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
5.1%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
SCDS
Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc.
1.13%
Moog, Inc.
1.04%
The Chefs' Warehouse, Inc.
0.98%
WSFS Financial Corp.
0.97%
AZZ, Inc.
0.95%
Life Time Group Holdings, Inc.
0.95%
Monarch Casino & Resort, Inc.
0.90%
Enova International, Inc.
0.86%
Knowles Corp.
0.85%
MYR Group, Inc.
0.82%
Kite Realty Group Trust
0.82%
First Financial Bancorp (Ohio)
0.80%
Perimeter Solutions, Inc.
0.78%
First Interstate BancSystem, Inc.
0.78%
Rush Enterprises, Inc.
0.77%
IWMW
BlackRock Cash Funds - Treasury
0.61%
Moog, Inc.
0.39%
BrightSpring Health Services, Inc.
0.38%
Hut 8 Corp.
0.36%
UMB Financial Corp.
0.35%
Cytokinetics, Inc.
0.34%
ViaSat, Inc.
0.32%
Glaukos Corp.
0.31%
Krystal Biotech, Inc.
0.31%
CareTrust REIT, Inc.
0.30%
Old National Bancorp
0.30%
Brinker International, Inc.
0.29%
Crinetics Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
0.28%
HealthEquity, Inc.
0.28%
JFrog Ltd.
0.28%
Frequently asked questions about SCDS and IWMW
How have the SCDS and IWMW ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 11, 2026, SCDS is up 23.5% year-to-date (YTD), while IWMW has returned 13.7%. That puts SCDS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: SCDS or IWMW?
Year-to-date, the SCDS ETF saw +$752K in flows, compared to +$24M for IWMW.
Which ETF is more volatile: SCDS or IWMW?
Over the past year, SCDS had a volatility of 17.62%, while IWMW experienced 12.34%.
Which ETF is bigger: SCDS or IWMW?
As of September 11, 2026, SCDS holds $9.60 M in assets under management (AUM), while IWMW manages $58.07 M.
What sectors do the SCDS and IWMW ETFs invest in?
SCDS leans toward sectors like Finance, Healthcare and Technology. Meanwhile, IWMW focuses on Finance, Healthcare and Technology.
What are the top holdings of the SCDS ETF and IWMW ETF?
SCDS top holdings include Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc., Moog, Inc. and The Chefs' Warehouse, Inc.. IWMW holds in its top three: BlackRock Cash Funds - Treasury, Moog, Inc. and BrightSpring Health Services, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: SCDS or IWMW?
SCDS holds 270 securities with 13.4% of its assets in the top 15. IWMW has 1957 securities and a top 15 weight of 5.1%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
