SCCRvsPZTETF Comparison
VS
Schwab Core Bond ETF (SCCR) belongs to the US Aggregate Bonds segment. Invesco New York AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF (PZT) is part of the Municipal Bonds segment. SCCR's top 3 sector exposures are Finance, Sovereign and Industrials. In contrast, PZT's top sector exposures are Municipal. SCCR is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.16%, versus 0.28% for PZT. SCCR is down -1.29% year-to-date (YTD) with +$767M in YTD flows. PZT performs worse with -5.08% YTD performance, and +$7M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of SCCR and PZT below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
SCCR vs PZT performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/18/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | SCCR PZT | -1.17%-3.42% | -2.11%-5.93% | -1.29%-5.08% | -0.31%-3.77% | n/a+3.89% | n/a-7.87% |
| Flows | SCCR PZT | +$77M-$951K | +$362M+$5M | +$767M+$7M | +$915M+$3M | -+$53M | -+$43M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | SCCR PZT | +4.07%+4.88% | +3.77%+3.95% | n/a+5.76% | n/a+5.60% |
| Max drawdown | SCCR PZT | -2.70%-6.76% | -3.30%-6.84% | n/a-8.97% | n/a-18.68% |
| Max drawdown duration | SCCR PZT | 81d74d | 201d201d | n/a432d | n/a1719d |
Trading data
SCCR | PZT | |
Last sale 9/18/2026 at 1:30 PM | $24.73 | $21.11 |
| Previous close 09/17/2026 | $24.82 | $21.15 |
| Consolidated volume 09/17/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 21, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
SCCR
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexSCCR | PZT | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/18/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
SCCR | PZT | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $24.73 | $21.11 |
| 1D performance | -0.34% | -0.19% |
| AuM | $1.79 B | $133.36 M |
| E/R | 0.16% | 0.28% |
Characteristics
SCCR | PZT | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Schwab ETFs | Invesco |
| Benchmark | - | ICE BofA New York Long-Term Core Plus Municipal Securities Index |
| N° of holdings | 220 | 734 |
| Asset class | - | Bonds |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | February 5, 2025 | October 11, 2007 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
SCCR
USA
71.63%
Other
28.37%
PZT
USA
71.26%
Other
28.74%
Sectors
SCCR
Finance
18.58%
Sovereign
18.39%
Industrials
13.24%
Municipal
8.7%
Other
41.09%
PZT
Municipal
71.26%
Other
28.74%
Diversification
SCCR
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
21.47%
PZT
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
12.03%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
SCCR
USA, Notes 4.125% 30jun2028, USD (BD-2028)
2.51%
USA, Notes 3.875% 15apr2029, USD (AM-2029)
1.85%
USA, Notes 4% 31may2028, USD (BC-2028)
1.77%
USA, Notes 4.125% 15jun2029, USD (AP-2029)
1.77%
USA, Notes 3.5% 15mar2029, USD (AL-2029)
1.70%
USA, Notes 4.125% 31may2031, USD (Z-2031)
1.42%
USA, Notes 4.125% 30jun2031, USD (AA-2031)
1.42%
USA, Bonds 4.625% 15feb2055, USD
1.32%
USA, Notes 3.5% 28feb2031, USD (V-2031)
1.26%
US3132DWEK53
1.19%
United Airlines 2016-2, 2.875% 7apr2030, USD (ABS)
1.13%
USA, Bonds 5% 15may2046, USD
1.07%
USA, Bonds 4.75% 15may2055, USD
1.06%
United Airlines 2019-2, 2.7% 1nov2033, USD (ABS, AA)
1.03%
American Airlines 2021-1, 2.875% 11jan2036, USD (ABS, A)
0.96%
PZT
New York Dormitory Authority, 5.5% 1jul2054, USD (2024A)
1.76%
Hudson Yards Infrastructure Corp., 5% 15feb2042, USD
0.94%
New York Dormitory Authority, 4.25% 1may2052, USD (2022A)
0.88%
New York Power Authority, 4% 15nov2050, USD
0.82%
Battery Park City Authority, 5.25% 1nov2055, USD (2025)
0.80%
New York Dormitory Authority, 5.25% 1may2054, USD (2024A)
0.76%
US649519DW23
0.74%
New York Power Authority, 4% 15nov2055, USD
0.74%
Monroe Industrial Development Corp., 4% 1jul2050, USD (2020A)
0.73%
New York Liberty Development Corp., 2.45% 15sep2069, USD (2019)
0.71%
Hudson Yards Infrastructure Corp., 4% 15feb2047, USD
0.68%
New York Dormitory Authority, 5% 1may2052, USD (2022A)
0.64%
New York Dormitory Authority, 5.5% 1oct2054, USD (2024)
0.62%
Hudson Yards Infrastructure Corp., 4% 15feb2044, USD
0.62%
New York Liberty Development Corp., 2.8% 15sep2069, USD (2019)
0.61%
Frequently asked questions about SCCR and PZT
How have the SCCR and PZT ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 18, 2026, SCCR is down -1.29% year-to-date (YTD), while PZT has lost -5.08%. That puts SCCR better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: SCCR or PZT?
Year-to-date, the SCCR ETF saw +$767M in flows, compared to +$7M for PZT.
Which ETF is more volatile: SCCR or PZT?
Over the past year, SCCR had a volatility of 3.77%, while PZT experienced 3.95%.
Which ETF is bigger: SCCR or PZT?
As of September 18, 2026, SCCR holds $1.79 B in assets under management (AUM), while PZT manages $133.36 M.
What sectors do the SCCR and PZT ETFs invest in?
SCCR leans toward sectors like Finance, Sovereign and Industrials. Meanwhile, PZT focuses on Municipal.
What are the top holdings of the SCCR ETF and PZT ETF?
SCCR top holdings include USA, Notes 4.125% 30jun2028, USD (BD-2028), USA, Notes 3.875% 15apr2029, USD (AM-2029) and USA, Notes 4% 31may2028, USD (BC-2028). PZT holds in its top three: New York Dormitory Authority, 5.5% 1jul2054, USD (2024A), Hudson Yards Infrastructure Corp., 5% 15feb2042, USD and New York Dormitory Authority, 4.25% 1may2052, USD (2022A).
Which ETF is more diversified: SCCR or PZT?
SCCR holds 413 securities with 21.47% of its assets in the top 15. PZT has 1222 securities and a top 15 weight of 12.03%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
