SAWSvsABLSETF Comparison
VS
AAM Sawgrass US Small Cap Quality Growth ETF (SAWS) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders ETF (ABLS) is part of the US Small Cap segment. SAWS's top 3 sector exposures are Healthcare, Industrials and Technology. In contrast, ABLS's top sector exposures are Healthcare, Finance and Industrials. SAWS is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.55%, versus 0.59% for ABLS. SAWS is up 18.77% year-to-date (YTD) with +$6M in YTD flows. ABLS performs worse with 18.36% YTD performance, and -$682K in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of SAWS and ABLS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
SAWS vs ABLS performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 08/04/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | SAWS ABLS | -1.24%-1.00% | +6.50%+15.48% | +18.77%+18.36% | +27.45%+17.00% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | SAWS ABLS | +$245K-$884K | +$498K-$884K | +$6M-$682K | +$6M-$682K | -- | -- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | SAWS ABLS | +19.29%+17.32% | +18.85%+18.05% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | SAWS ABLS | -7.50%-7.08% | -10.29%-15.92% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | SAWS ABLS | 35d29d | 49d265d | n/an/a | n/an/a |
Trading data
SAWS | ABLS | |
Last sale 8/6/2026 at 2:38 PM | $24.84 | |
| Previous close 08/04/2026 | $24.84 | |
| Consolidated volume 08/04/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of July 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
SAWS
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexSAWS | ABLS | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 8/6/2026 at 2:38 PM
Live
Closed
SAWS | ABLS | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $24.84 | – |
| 1D performance | -0.01% | – |
| AuM | $8.02 M | $0.48 M |
| E/R | 0.55% | 0.59% |
Characteristics
SAWS | ABLS | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Advisors Asset Management | Abacus FCF Advisors |
| Benchmark | - | Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders Index |
| N° of holdings | 71 | 46 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 31, 2024 | February 18, 2025 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
SAWS
USA
95.82%
Other
4.18%
ABLS
USA
97.52%
Other
2.48%
Sectors
SAWS
Healthcare
20.17%
Industrials
19.46%
Technology
17.57%
Finance
12.4%
Other
30.4%
ABLS
Healthcare
25.1%
Finance
20.27%
Industrials
17.38%
Technology
16.19%
Consumer Cyclical.
7.09%
Other
13.97%
Advertisement
Diversification
SAWS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
40.73%
ABLS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
63.47%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
SAWS
StoneX Group, Inc.
4.62%
BrightSpring Health Services, Inc.
3.49%
PriceSmart, Inc.
3.19%
Archrock, Inc.
3.19%
IRadimed Corp.
2.83%
Sanmina Corp.
2.74%
The Gorman-Rupp Co.
2.72%
Granite Construction, Inc.
2.67%
Digi International, Inc.
2.36%
Advanced Energy Industries, Inc.
2.30%
A10 Networks, Inc.
2.27%
Mueller Industries, Inc.
2.18%
Enova International, Inc.
2.14%
MYR Group, Inc.
2.07%
ESCO Technologies, Inc.
1.96%
ABLS
Argan, Inc.
15.13%
Enova International, Inc.
5.59%
Oscar Health, Inc.
5.43%
Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc.
4.31%
Artisan Partners Asset Management, Inc.
3.90%
Healthcare Services Group, Inc.
3.82%
Harmony Biosciences Holdings, Inc.
3.52%
Kontoor Brands, Inc.
3.25%
Progyny, Inc.
2.98%
World Acceptance Corp.
2.82%
Qualys, Inc.
2.80%
Pediatrix Medical Group, Inc.
2.58%
Catalyst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
2.49%
Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)
2.47%
PJT Partners, Inc.
2.38%
Frequently asked questions about SAWS and ABLS
How have the SAWS and ABLS ETFs performed in 2026?
As of August 4, 2026, SAWS is up 18.77% year-to-date (YTD), while ABLS has returned 18.36%. That puts SAWS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: SAWS or ABLS?
Year-to-date, the SAWS ETF saw +$6M in flows, compared to -$682K for ABLS.
Which ETF is more volatile: SAWS or ABLS?
Over the past year, SAWS had a volatility of 18.85%, while ABLS experienced 18.05%.
Which ETF is bigger: SAWS or ABLS?
As of August 4, 2026, SAWS holds $8.02 M in assets under management (AUM), while ABLS manages $0.48 M.
What sectors do the SAWS and ABLS ETFs invest in?
SAWS leans toward sectors like Healthcare, Industrials and Technology. Meanwhile, ABLS focuses on Healthcare, Finance and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the SAWS ETF and ABLS ETF?
SAWS top holdings include StoneX Group, Inc., BrightSpring Health Services, Inc. and PriceSmart, Inc.. ABLS holds in its top three: Argan, Inc., Enova International, Inc. and Oscar Health, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: SAWS or ABLS?
SAWS holds 71 securities with 40.73% of its assets in the top 15. ABLS has 46 securities and a top 15 weight of 63.47%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
