Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
RZGvsVTWGETF Comparison
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Growth ETF (RZG) and Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF (VTWG) belong to the same industry segment: US Small Cap Growth. RZG's top 3 sector exposures are Health Care, Industrials and Information Technology. In contrast, VTWG's top sector exposures are Health Care, Information Technology and Industrials. RZG is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 0.06% for VTWG. RZG is up 5.46% year-to-date (YTD) with -$35K in YTD flows. VTWG performs worse with 0.56% YTD performance, and +$68M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of RZG and VTWG below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
RZG vs VTWG performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | RZG VTWG | -3.25%-4.77% | +2.95%-2.56% | +5.46%+0.56% | +25.38%+27.24% | +52.63%+51.81% | +12.26%+9.89% |
| Flows | RZG VTWG | -$584K-$400K | -$1M+$114M | -$35K+$68M | -$13M+$80M | -$18M+$202M | -$39M+$342M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | RZG VTWG | +17.06%+20.99% | +22.31%+24.94% | +20.34%+22.04% | +22.97%+24.72% |
| Max drawdown | RZG VTWG | -5.58%-9.45% | -14.71%-17.20% | -25.62%-28.47% | -38.45%-40.46% |
| Max drawdown duration | RZG VTWG | 12d47d | 46d46d | 296d280d | 1521d1409d |
RZG | VTWG | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $57.04 | $237.06 |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $57.32 | $237.17 |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
RZG | VTWG | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
RZG | VTWG | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $57.04 | $237.06 |
| 1D performance | -0.49% | -0.05% |
| AuM | $108.91 M | $1.22 B |
| E/R | 0.35% | 0.06% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the RZG and VTWG ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, RZG is up 5.46% year-to-date (YTD), while VTWG has returned 0.56%. That puts RZG better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: RZG or VTWG?
Year-to-date, the RZG ETF saw -$35K in flows, compared to +$68M for VTWG.
Which ETF is more volatile: RZG or VTWG?
Over the past year, RZG had a volatility of 22.31%, while VTWG experienced 24.94%.
Which ETF is bigger: RZG or VTWG?
As of March 10, 2026, RZG holds $108.91 M in assets under management (AUM), while VTWG manages $1.22 B.
What sectors do the RZG and VTWG ETFs invest in?
RZG leans toward sectors like Health Care, Industrials and Information Technology. Meanwhile, VTWG focuses on Health Care, Information Technology and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the RZG ETF and VTWG ETF?
RZG top holdings include ACM RESEARCH, PTC THERAPEUTI/D and TRANSMEDICS GROUP. VTWG holds in its top three: BLOOM ENERGY CORP, CREDO TECHNOLOGY GROUP HOLDING and FABRINET.
Which ETF is more diversified: RZG or VTWG?
RZG holds 130 securities with 21.07% of its assets in the top 15. VTWG has 1112 securities and a top 15 weight of 13.39%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
