Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
RZGvsJSMLETF Comparison
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Growth ETF (RZG) and Janus Henderson Small Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSML) belong to the same industry segment: US Small Cap Growth. RZG's top 3 sector exposures are Health Care, Industrials and Information Technology. In contrast, JSML's top sector exposures are Health Care, Information Technology and Industrials. RZG is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 0.3% for JSML. RZG is up 2.49% year-to-date (YTD) with -$35K in YTD flows. JSML performs worse with -1.88% YTD performance, and +$28M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of RZG and JSML below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
RZG vs JSML performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | RZG JSML | -4.52%-5.79% | -0.63%-5.84% | +2.49%-1.88% | +21.63%+21.67% | +51.00%+54.46% | +6.84%+7.33% |
| Flows | RZG JSML | -$584K+$2M | -$1M+$28M | -$35K+$28M | -$14M-$4M | -$18M+$147M | -$39M+$139M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | RZG JSML | +17.53%+19.21% | +22.44%+23.29% | +20.35%+21.43% | +22.97%+23.94% |
| Max drawdown | RZG JSML | -6.97%-9.72% | -14.71%-12.69% | -25.62%-25.88% | -38.45%-37.88% |
| Max drawdown duration | RZG JSML | 14d48d | 46d44d | 296d287d | 1521d1160d |
RZG | JSML | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $55.63 | $70.21 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $55.65 | $70.12 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
RZG | JSML | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
RZG | JSML | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $55.63 | $70.21 |
| 1D performance | -0.04% | +0.13% |
| AuM | $105.85 M | $278.16 M |
| E/R | 0.35% | 0.3% |
RZG | JSML | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | Invesco | Janus Henderson Investors |
| Benchmark | S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 120 | 108 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 1, 2006 | February 23, 2016 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the RZG and JSML ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, RZG is up 2.49% year-to-date (YTD), while JSML has lost -1.88%. That puts RZG better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: RZG or JSML?
Year-to-date, the RZG ETF saw -$35K in flows, compared to +$28M for JSML.
Which ETF is more volatile: RZG or JSML?
Over the past year, RZG had a volatility of 22.44%, while JSML experienced 23.29%.
Which ETF is bigger: RZG or JSML?
As of March 12, 2026, RZG holds $105.85 M in assets under management (AUM), while JSML manages $278.16 M.
What sectors do the RZG and JSML ETFs invest in?
RZG leans toward sectors like Health Care, Industrials and Information Technology. Meanwhile, JSML focuses on Health Care, Information Technology and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the RZG ETF and JSML ETF?
RZG top holdings include ACM RESEARCH, PTC THERAPEUTI/D and TRANSMEDICS GROUP. JSML holds in its top three: BLOOM ENERGY CORP, ENOVA INTERNATIONAL and CACTUS INC.
Which ETF is more diversified: RZG or JSML?
RZG holds 130 securities with 21.07% of its assets in the top 15. JSML has 110 securities and a top 15 weight of 26.24%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
