Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
RZGvsABLSETF Comparison
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Growth ETF (RZG) belongs to the US Small Cap Growth segment. Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders ETF (ABLS) is part of the US Small Cap segment. RZG's top 3 sector exposures are Health Care, Industrials and Information Technology. In contrast, ABLS's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Financials and Health Care. RZG is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 0.59% for ABLS. RZG is up 2.49% year-to-date (YTD) with -$35K in YTD flows. ABLS performs worse with -9.48% YTD performance, and - in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of RZG and ABLS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
RZG vs ABLS performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | RZG ABLS | -4.52%-5.61% | -0.63%-12.64% | +2.49%-9.48% | +21.63%-5.41% | +51.00%n/a | +6.84%n/a |
| Flows | RZG ABLS | -$584K- | -$1M- | -$35K- | -$14M+$225K | -$18M- | -$39M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | RZG ABLS | +17.53%+18.62% | +22.44%+21.80% | +20.35%n/a | +22.97%n/a |
| Max drawdown | RZG ABLS | -6.97%-12.64% | -14.71%-14.20% | -25.62%n/a | -38.45%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | RZG ABLS | 14d88d | 46d249d | 296dn/a | 1521dn/a |
RZG | ABLS | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $55.63 | |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $55.65 | |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
RZG | ABLS | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
RZG | ABLS | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $55.63 | – |
| 1D performance | -0.04% | – |
| AuM | $105.85 M | $0.91 M |
| E/R | 0.35% | 0.59% |
RZG | ABLS | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Invesco | Abacus FCF Advisors |
| Benchmark | S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth Index | Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders Index |
| N° of holdings | 120 | 48 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 1, 2006 | February 18, 2025 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the RZG and ABLS ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, RZG is up 2.49% year-to-date (YTD), while ABLS has lost -9.48%. That puts RZG better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: RZG or ABLS?
Year-to-date, the RZG ETF saw -$35K in flows, compared to - for ABLS.
Which ETF is more volatile: RZG or ABLS?
Over the past year, RZG had a volatility of 22.44%, while ABLS experienced 21.8%.
Which ETF is bigger: RZG or ABLS?
As of March 12, 2026, RZG holds $105.85 M in assets under management (AUM), while ABLS manages $0.91 M.
What sectors do the RZG and ABLS ETFs invest in?
RZG leans toward sectors like Health Care, Industrials and Information Technology. Meanwhile, ABLS focuses on Information Technology, Financials and Health Care.
What are the top holdings of the RZG ETF and ABLS ETF?
RZG top holdings include ACM RESEARCH, PTC THERAPEUTI/D and TRANSMEDICS GROUP. ABLS holds in its top three: ARGAN, COLLEGIUM PHAR/D and ARTISAN PARTNERS ASSET MANAGEMENT INC.
Which ETF is more diversified: RZG or ABLS?
RZG holds 130 securities with 21.07% of its assets in the top 15. ABLS has 50 securities and a top 15 weight of 53.41%.
Have you tried our ETF Compare tool?
Compare ETFs like a pro. Analyze fees, performance, exposure & holdings side-by-side.