RZGvsABLSETF Comparison
VS
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Growth ETF (RZG) belongs to the US Small Cap Growth segment. Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders ETF (ABLS) is part of the US Small Cap segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Healthcare, Finance and Industrials. RZG is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 0.59% for ABLS. RZG is up 27.37% year-to-date (YTD) with +$8M in YTD flows. ABLS performs worse with 12.7% YTD performance, and -$682K in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of RZG and ABLS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
RZG vs ABLS performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/27/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | RZG ABLS | -4.01%-3.51% | +8.73%+11.35% | +27.37%+12.70% | +34.10%+9.89% | +63.26%n/a | +37.33%n/a |
| Flows | RZG ABLS | +$9M-$884K | +$8M-$682K | +$8M-$682K | +$7M-$682K | -$7M- | -$21M- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | RZG ABLS | +18.51%+16.96% | +18.89%+18.01% | +20.52%n/a | +22.84%n/a |
| Max drawdown | RZG ABLS | -5.67%-7.08% | -8.40%-15.92% | -25.62%n/a | -38.45%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | RZG ABLS | 27d21d | 43d265d | 296dn/a | 1521dn/a |
Trading data
RZG | ABLS | |
Last sale 7/28/2026 at 1:30 PM | $68.91 | |
| Previous close 07/27/2026 | $69.12 | |
| Consolidated volume 07/27/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
RZG | ABLS | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/28/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
RZG | ABLS | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $68.91 | – |
| 1D performance | -0.30% | – |
| AuM | $138.70 M | $0.46 M |
| E/R | 0.35% | 0.59% |
Characteristics
RZG | ABLS | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Invesco | Abacus FCF Advisors |
| Benchmark | S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth Index | Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders Index |
| N° of holdings | 125 | 46 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 1, 2006 | February 18, 2025 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
RZG
USA
97.05%
Other
2.95%
ABLS
USA
97.52%
Other
2.48%
Sectors
RZG
Healthcare
24.82%
Finance
22.06%
Industrials
16%
Technology
11.66%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
8.26%
Other
17.2%
ABLS
Healthcare
25.1%
Finance
20.27%
Industrials
17.38%
Technology
16.19%
Consumer Cyclical.
7.09%
Other
13.97%
Advertisement
Diversification
RZG
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
24.86%
ABLS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
63.47%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
RZG
ACM Research, Inc.
3.05%
Powell Industries, Inc.
1.96%
Argan, Inc.
1.91%
StoneX Group, Inc.
1.85%
Dave, Inc.
1.69%
Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc.
1.54%
Clear Secure, Inc.
1.49%
Sphere Entertainment Co.
1.49%
Alignment Healthcare, Inc.
1.45%
Liquidia Corp.
1.45%
PTC Therapeutics, Inc.
1.43%
Uniti Group, Inc.
1.39%
Adamas Trust, Inc.
1.38%
Enova International, Inc.
1.38%
Sezzle, Inc.
1.38%
ABLS
Argan, Inc.
15.13%
Enova International, Inc.
5.59%
Oscar Health, Inc.
5.43%
Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc.
4.31%
Artisan Partners Asset Management, Inc.
3.90%
Healthcare Services Group, Inc.
3.82%
Harmony Biosciences Holdings, Inc.
3.52%
Kontoor Brands, Inc.
3.25%
Progyny, Inc.
2.98%
World Acceptance Corp.
2.82%
Qualys, Inc.
2.80%
Pediatrix Medical Group, Inc.
2.58%
Catalyst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
2.49%
Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)
2.47%
PJT Partners, Inc.
2.38%
Frequently asked questions about RZG and ABLS
How have the RZG and ABLS ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 27, 2026, RZG is up 27.37% year-to-date (YTD), while ABLS has returned 12.7%. That puts RZG better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: RZG or ABLS?
Year-to-date, the RZG ETF saw +$8M in flows, compared to -$682K for ABLS.
Which ETF is more volatile: RZG or ABLS?
Over the past year, RZG had a volatility of 18.89%, while ABLS experienced 18.01%.
Which ETF is bigger: RZG or ABLS?
As of July 27, 2026, RZG holds $138.70 M in assets under management (AUM), while ABLS manages $0.46 M.
What sectors do the RZG and ABLS ETFs invest in?
RZG leans toward sectors like Healthcare, Finance and Industrials. Meanwhile, ABLS focuses on Healthcare, Finance and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the RZG ETF and ABLS ETF?
RZG top holdings include ACM Research, Inc., Powell Industries, Inc. and Argan, Inc.. ABLS holds in its top three: Argan, Inc., Enova International, Inc. and Oscar Health, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: RZG or ABLS?
RZG holds 125 securities with 24.86% of its assets in the top 15. ABLS has 46 securities and a top 15 weight of 63.47%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
