Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
RYLGvsRESMETF Comparison
Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call & Growth ETF
Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call & Growth ETF (RYLG) belongs to the Options Strategies segment. Columbia Research Enhanced Small Cap ETF (RESM) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. RYLG's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Health Care and Financials. In contrast, RESM's top sector exposures are Industrials, Financials and Information Technology. RYLG is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 0.32% for RESM. RYLG is up 2.38% year-to-date (YTD) with -$234K in YTD flows. RESM performs better with 3.46% YTD performance, and -$2M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of RYLG and RESM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
RYLG vs RESM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | RYLG RESM | -3.18%-4.38% | +0.57%+1.19% | +2.38%+3.46% | +20.49%n/a | +37.36%n/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | RYLG RESM | --$2M | -$234K+$3M | -$234K-$2M | +$208K- | +$5M- | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | RYLG RESM | +14.66%+16.04% | +19.57%n/a | +16.89%n/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | RYLG RESM | -4.70%-5.45% | -15.02%n/a | -22.43%n/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | RYLG RESM | 13d12d | 74dn/a | 296dn/a | n/an/a |
RYLG | RESM | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 7:18 PM | $22.38 | $20.46 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $22.35 | $20.56 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
RYLG | RESM | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
RYLG | RESM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $22.38 | $20.46 |
| 1D performance | +0.14% | -0.50% |
| AuM | $7.84 M | $3.09 M |
| E/R | 0.35% | 0.32% |
RYLG | RESM | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | Global X | Columbia Threadneedle Investments |
| Benchmark | Cboe Russell 2000 Half BuyWrite Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 1631 | 864 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 4, 2022 | December 11, 2025 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the RYLG and RESM ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, RYLG is up 2.38% year-to-date (YTD), while RESM has returned 3.46%. That puts RESM better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: RYLG or RESM?
Year-to-date, the RYLG ETF saw -$234K in flows, compared to -$2M for RESM.
Which ETF is bigger: RYLG or RESM?
As of March 11, 2026, RYLG holds $7.84 M in assets under management (AUM), while RESM manages $3.09 M.
What sectors do the RYLG and RESM ETFs invest in?
RYLG leans toward sectors like Industrials, Health Care and Financials. Meanwhile, RESM focuses on Industrials, Financials and Information Technology.
What are the top holdings of the RYLG ETF and RESM ETF?
RYLG top holdings include BLOOM ENERGY CORP, CREDO TECHNOLOGY GROUP HOLDING and KRATOS DEFENSE AND SECURITY SOLS. RESM holds in its top three: FABRINET, LEXINGTON REIT and HECLA MINING.
Which ETF is more diversified: RYLG or RESM?
RYLG holds 1883 securities with 7.8% of its assets in the top 15. RESM has 879 securities and a top 15 weight of 8.1%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
