Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
RYLGvsIWMWETF Comparison
Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call & Growth ETF
Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call & Growth ETF (RYLG) and iShares Russell 2000 BuyWrite ETF (IWMW) belong to the same industry segment: Options Strategies. RYLG's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Health Care and Financials. In contrast, IWMW's top sector exposures are Industrials, Financials and Health Care. RYLG is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 0.39% for IWMW. RYLG is up 0.21% year-to-date (YTD) with -$234K in YTD flows. IWMW performs worse with -0.85% YTD performance, and +$13M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of RYLG and IWMW below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
RYLG vs IWMW performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | RYLG IWMW | -3.47%-2.68% | -0.90%-0.98% | +0.21%-0.85% | +17.85%+13.46% | +34.44%n/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | RYLG IWMW | -+$4M | -$234K+$17M | -$234K+$13M | +$208K+$27M | +$5M- | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | RYLG IWMW | +15.24%+13.57% | +19.70%+17.61% | +16.93%n/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | RYLG IWMW | -5.97%-5.49% | -15.02%-14.60% | -22.43%n/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | RYLG IWMW | 14d14d | 74d98d | 296dn/a | n/an/a |
RYLG | IWMW | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $21.84 | $36.94 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $21.92 | $37.07 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
RYLG | IWMW | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
RYLG | IWMW | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $21.84 | $36.94 |
| 1D performance | -0.36% | -0.35% |
| AuM | $7.67 M | $45.89 M |
| E/R | 0.35% | 0.39% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the RYLG and IWMW ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, RYLG is up 0.21% year-to-date (YTD), while IWMW has lost -0.85%. That puts RYLG better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: RYLG or IWMW?
Year-to-date, the RYLG ETF saw -$234K in flows, compared to +$13M for IWMW.
Which ETF is more volatile: RYLG or IWMW?
Over the past year, RYLG had a volatility of 19.7%, while IWMW experienced 17.61%.
Which ETF is bigger: RYLG or IWMW?
As of March 12, 2026, RYLG holds $7.67 M in assets under management (AUM), while IWMW manages $45.89 M.
What sectors do the RYLG and IWMW ETFs invest in?
RYLG leans toward sectors like Industrials, Health Care and Financials. Meanwhile, IWMW focuses on Industrials, Financials and Health Care.
What are the top holdings of the RYLG ETF and IWMW ETF?
RYLG top holdings include BLOOM ENERGY CORP, CREDO TECHNOLOGY GROUP HOLDING and KRATOS DEFENSE AND SECURITY SOLS. IWMW holds in its top three: BLOOM ENERGY CORP, CREDO TECHNOLOGY GROUP HOLDING and KRATOS DEFENSE AND SECURITY SOLS.
Which ETF is more diversified: RYLG or IWMW?
RYLG holds 1883 securities with 7.8% of its assets in the top 15. IWMW has 1942 securities and a top 15 weight of 8.07%.
Have you tried our ETF Compare tool?
Compare ETFs like a pro. Analyze fees, performance, exposure & holdings side-by-side.