Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
RYLGvsITWOETF Comparison
Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call & Growth ETF
Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call & Growth ETF (RYLG) and ProShares Russell 2000 High Income ETF (ITWO) belong to the same industry segment: Options Strategies. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Industrials, Health Care and Financials. RYLG is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 0.55% for ITWO. RYLG is up 2.42% year-to-date (YTD) with -$234K in YTD flows. ITWO performs better with 3.28% YTD performance, and +$47M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of RYLG and ITWO below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
RYLG vs ITWO performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | RYLG ITWO | -3.24%-3.86% | +1.15%+0.26% | +2.42%+3.28% | +20.81%+27.78% | +35.15%n/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | RYLG ITWO | -+$9M | -$234K+$63M | -$234K+$47M | +$208K+$101M | +$5M- | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | RYLG ITWO | +14.70%+17.33% | +19.57%+21.04% | +16.92%n/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | RYLG ITWO | -4.70%-6.95% | -15.02%-15.09% | -22.43%n/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | RYLG ITWO | 12d47d | 74d73d | 296dn/a | n/an/a |
RYLG | ITWO | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $22.38 | $40.33 |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $22.35 | $40.41 |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
RYLG | ITWO | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
RYLG | ITWO | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $22.38 | $40.33 |
| 1D performance | +0.14% | -0.20% |
| AuM | $7.84 M | $151.34 M |
| E/R | 0.35% | 0.55% |
RYLG | ITWO | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Global X | ProShares |
| Benchmark | Cboe Russell 2000 Half BuyWrite Index | Cboe Russell 2000 Daily Covered Call Index |
| N° of holdings | 1631 | 1630 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 4, 2022 | September 4, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the RYLG and ITWO ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, RYLG is up 2.42% year-to-date (YTD), while ITWO has returned 3.28%. That puts ITWO better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: RYLG or ITWO?
Year-to-date, the RYLG ETF saw -$234K in flows, compared to +$47M for ITWO.
Which ETF is more volatile: RYLG or ITWO?
Over the past year, RYLG had a volatility of 19.57%, while ITWO experienced 21.04%.
Which ETF is bigger: RYLG or ITWO?
As of March 10, 2026, RYLG holds $7.84 M in assets under management (AUM), while ITWO manages $151.34 M.
What sectors do the RYLG and ITWO ETFs invest in?
RYLG leans toward sectors like Industrials, Health Care and Financials. Meanwhile, ITWO focuses on Industrials, Health Care and Financials.
What are the top holdings of the RYLG ETF and ITWO ETF?
RYLG top holdings include BLOOM ENERGY CORP, CREDO TECHNOLOGY GROUP HOLDING and KRATOS DEFENSE AND SECURITY SOLS. ITWO holds in its top three: BLOOM ENERGY CORP, CREDO TECHNOLOGY GROUP HOLDING and HECLA MINING.
Which ETF is more diversified: RYLG or ITWO?
RYLG holds 1883 securities with 7.8% of its assets in the top 15. ITWO has 1884 securities and a top 15 weight of 6.55%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
