Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
RYLGvsGSSCETF Comparison
Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call & Growth ETF
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF
Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call & Growth ETF (RYLG) belongs to the Options Strategies segment. Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (GSSC) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. RYLG's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Health Care and Financials. In contrast, GSSC's top sector exposures are Health Care, Financials and Industrials. RYLG is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 0.2% for GSSC. RYLG is up 2.38% year-to-date (YTD) with -$234K in YTD flows. GSSC performs worse with 0.51% YTD performance, and +$134M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of RYLG and GSSC below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
RYLG vs GSSC performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | RYLG GSSC | -3.18%-5.44% | +0.57%-1.93% | +2.38%+0.51% | +20.49%+21.49% | +37.36%+43.51% | n/a+27.07% |
| Flows | RYLG GSSC | -- | -$234K+$137M | -$234K+$134M | +$208K+$250M | +$5M+$245M | -+$405M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | RYLG GSSC | +14.66%+17.08% | +19.57%+22.32% | +16.89%+20.63% | n/a+21.61% |
| Max drawdown | RYLG GSSC | -4.70%-7.02% | -15.02%-15.00% | -22.43%-25.99% | n/a-27.32% |
| Max drawdown duration | RYLG GSSC | 13d47d | 74d46d | 296d289d | n/a977d |
RYLG | GSSC | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 7:18 PM | $22.38 | $74.56 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $22.35 | $75.71 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
RYLG | GSSC | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
RYLG | GSSC | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $22.38 | $74.56 |
| 1D performance | +0.14% | -1.52% |
| AuM | $7.84 M | $858.08 M |
| E/R | 0.35% | 0.2% |
RYLG | GSSC | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Global X | Goldman Sachs |
| Benchmark | Cboe Russell 2000 Half BuyWrite Index | Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Small Cap Equity Index |
| N° of holdings | 1631 | 1210 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 4, 2022 | June 28, 2017 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the RYLG and GSSC ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, RYLG is up 2.38% year-to-date (YTD), while GSSC has returned 0.51%. That puts RYLG better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: RYLG or GSSC?
Year-to-date, the RYLG ETF saw -$234K in flows, compared to +$134M for GSSC.
Which ETF is more volatile: RYLG or GSSC?
Over the past year, RYLG had a volatility of 19.57%, while GSSC experienced 22.32%.
Which ETF is bigger: RYLG or GSSC?
As of March 11, 2026, RYLG holds $7.84 M in assets under management (AUM), while GSSC manages $858.08 M.
What sectors do the RYLG and GSSC ETFs invest in?
RYLG leans toward sectors like Industrials, Health Care and Financials. Meanwhile, GSSC focuses on Health Care, Financials and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the RYLG ETF and GSSC ETF?
RYLG top holdings include BLOOM ENERGY CORP, CREDO TECHNOLOGY GROUP HOLDING and KRATOS DEFENSE AND SECURITY SOLS. GSSC holds in its top three: BLOOM ENERGY CORP, IES HOLDINGS and COMPASS.
Which ETF is more diversified: RYLG or GSSC?
RYLG holds 1883 securities with 7.8% of its assets in the top 15. GSSC has 1322 securities and a top 15 weight of 5.25%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
