Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
RWXvsIFGLETF Comparison
iShares International Developed Real Estate ETF
SPDR Dow Jones International Real Estate ETF (RWX) belongs to the Global Blended Cap segment. iShares International Developed Real Estate ETF (IFGL) is part of the Uncategorized Equities segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: and Real Estate. RWX is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.59%, versus 0.48% for IFGL. RWX is down -1.94% year-to-date (YTD) with -$9M in YTD flows. IFGL performs better with -0.22% YTD performance, and - in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of RWX and IFGL below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
RWX vs IFGL performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | RWX IFGL | -7.70%-8.54% | -0.16%+1.56% | -1.94%-0.22% | +18.72%+21.59% | +17.79%+23.52% | -1.72%-2.52% |
| Flows | RWX IFGL | -- | -$9M- | -$9M- | -$4M-$18M | -$187M-$67M | -$481M-$112M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | RWX IFGL | +13.04%+13.27% | +13.27%+12.88% | +13.63%+13.94% | +14.53%+14.82% |
| Max drawdown | RWX IFGL | -9.44%-10.03% | -9.44%-10.03% | -19.85%-18.24% | -35.71%-38.14% |
| Max drawdown duration | RWX IFGL | 12d12d | 12d12d | 274d272d | 1681d1737d |
RWX | IFGL | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $27.45 | $23.07 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $27.74 | $23.35 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
RWX | IFGL | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
RWX | IFGL | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $27.45 | $23.07 |
| 1D performance | -1.05% | -1.20% |
| AuM | $281.19 M | $85.31 M |
| E/R | 0.59% | 0.48% |
RWX | IFGL | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | SPDR | iShares |
| Benchmark | Dow Jones Global ex-U.S. Select Real Estate Securities Index | FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed Real Estate ex-U.S. Index |
| N° of holdings | 115 | 245 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 15, 2006 | November 12, 2007 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the RWX and IFGL ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 13, 2026, RWX is down -1.94% year-to-date (YTD), while IFGL has lost -0.22%. That puts IFGL better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: RWX or IFGL?
Year-to-date, the RWX ETF saw -$9M in flows, compared to - for IFGL.
Which ETF is more volatile: RWX or IFGL?
Over the past year, RWX had a volatility of 13.27%, while IFGL experienced 12.88%.
Which ETF is bigger: RWX or IFGL?
As of March 13, 2026, RWX holds $281.19 M in assets under management (AUM), while IFGL manages $85.31 M.
What sectors do the RWX and IFGL ETFs invest in?
RWX leans toward sectors like Real Estate. Meanwhile, IFGL focuses on Real Estate.
What are the top holdings of the RWX ETF and IFGL ETF?
RWX top holdings include MITSUI FUDOSAN, SCENTRE GROUP and SEGRO REIT. IFGL holds in its top three: GOODMAN GROUP CF, MITSUI FUDOSAN and MITSUBISHI ESTATE.
Which ETF is more diversified: RWX or IFGL?
RWX holds 118 securities with 36.49% of its assets in the top 15. IFGL has 261 securities and a top 15 weight of 35.2%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
