RWLCvsUSNZETF Comparison
ETF 1
RWLC
Rayliant Quantitative Developed Market Equity ETF
This fund is part of
Uncategorized Equities
-0.65%
VS
ETF 2
USNZ
Xtrackers Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned US Equity ETF
Rayliant Quantitative Developed Market Equity ETF (RWLC) belongs to the Uncategorized Equities segment. Xtrackers Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned US Equity ETF (USNZ) is part of the segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Technology, Finance and Healthcare. RWLC is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.32%, versus 0.1% for USNZ. RWLC is up 16.56% year-to-date (YTD) with -$33M in YTD flows. USNZ performs worse with 13.12% YTD performance, and -$17M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of RWLC and USNZ below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
RWLC vs USNZ performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 08/05/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | RWLC USNZ | +3.29%+2.47% | +7.27%+5.49% | +16.56%+13.12% | +22.03%+23.06% | +88.83%+73.67% | n/an/a |
| Flows | RWLC USNZ | -$2M-$159K | -$13M-$12M | -$33M-$17M | -$30M-$16M | -$17M+$36M | -- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | RWLC USNZ | +12.25%+15.40% | +12.38%+14.08% | +13.26%+15.46% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | RWLC USNZ | -4.61%-5.09% | -8.74%-11.08% | -15.40%-19.00% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | RWLC USNZ | 37d62d | 75d76d | 85d126d | n/an/a |
Trading data
RWLC | USNZ | |
Last sale 8/6/2026 at 1:30 PM | $38.41 | $48.71 |
| Previous close 08/06/2026 | $38.75 | $48.85 |
| Consolidated volume 08/06/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of July 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
RWLC
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexRWLC | USNZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 8/6/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
RWLC | USNZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $38.41 | $48.71 |
| 1D performance | -0.89% | -0.29% |
| AuM | $71.19 M | $299.41 M |
| E/R | 0.32% | 0.1% |
Characteristics
RWLC | USNZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Rayliant Asset Management | Xtrackers by DWS |
| Benchmark | - | Solactive ISS ESG United States Net Zero Pathway Enhanced Index |
| N° of holdings | 98 | 495 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 15, 2021 | June 28, 2022 |
| ESG | No | Yes |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
RWLC
USA
96.94%
Other
3.06%
USNZ
USA
97.69%
Other
2.31%
Sectors
RWLC
Technology
49.54%
Finance
12.72%
Healthcare
11.34%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
8.26%
Other
18.14%
USNZ
Technology
53.74%
Finance
13.48%
Healthcare
11.08%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
7.67%
Other
14.04%
Advertisement
Diversification
RWLC
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
49.69%
USNZ
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
49.95%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
RWLC
Apple, Inc.
8.43%
NVIDIA Corp.
6.30%
Micron Technology, Inc.
4.46%
Lam Research Corp.
4.16%
Alphabet, Inc.
4.04%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.59%
Western Digital Corp.
2.77%
Microsoft Corp.
2.53%
Mastercard, Inc.
2.45%
Amazon.com, Inc.
2.24%
Altria Group, Inc.
1.99%
Gilead Sciences, Inc.
1.79%
GE Vernova, Inc.
1.74%
Eli Lilly & Co.
1.63%
The Bank of New York Mellon Corp.
1.57%
USNZ
NVIDIA Corp.
9.43%
Apple, Inc.
8.48%
Microsoft Corp.
5.37%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.78%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.72%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.21%
Broadcom Inc.
2.98%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
2.18%
Micron Technology, Inc.
2.14%
Tesla, Inc.
1.83%
Eli Lilly & Co.
1.62%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
1.54%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.48%
Intel Corp.
1.15%
Johnson & Johnson
1.04%
Frequently asked questions about RWLC and USNZ
How have the RWLC and USNZ ETFs performed in 2026?
As of August 5, 2026, RWLC is up 16.56% year-to-date (YTD), while USNZ has returned 13.12%. That puts RWLC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: RWLC or USNZ?
Year-to-date, the RWLC ETF saw -$33M in flows, compared to -$17M for USNZ.
Which ETF is more volatile: RWLC or USNZ?
Over the past year, RWLC had a volatility of 12.38%, while USNZ experienced 14.08%.
Which ETF is bigger: RWLC or USNZ?
As of August 5, 2026, RWLC holds $71.19 M in assets under management (AUM), while USNZ manages $299.41 M.
What sectors do the RWLC and USNZ ETFs invest in?
RWLC leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Healthcare. Meanwhile, USNZ focuses on Technology, Finance and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the RWLC ETF and USNZ ETF?
RWLC top holdings include Apple, Inc., NVIDIA Corp. and Micron Technology, Inc.. USNZ holds in its top three: NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc. and Microsoft Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: RWLC or USNZ?
RWLC holds 100 securities with 49.69% of its assets in the top 15. USNZ has 502 securities and a top 15 weight of 49.95%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
