Open Now: The Global ETF Survey Take the Survey →

Advertisement
Advertisement

RWLCvsONOFETF Comparison

ETF 1
RWLC

Rayliant Quantitative Developed Market Equity ETF

This fund is part of
Uncategorized Equities
-0.65%
VS
ETF 2
ONOF

Global X Adaptive U.S. Risk Management ETF

This fund is part of
Multi-Asset: Other
-0.09%

Rayliant Quantitative Developed Market Equity ETF (RWLC) belongs to the Uncategorized Equities segment. Global X Adaptive U.S. Risk Management ETF (ONOF) is part of the Multi-Asset: Other segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Technology, Finance and Healthcare. RWLC is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.32%, versus 0.39% for ONOF. RWLC is up 16.56% year-to-date (YTD) with -$33M in YTD flows. ONOF performs worse with 9.48% YTD performance, and -$13M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of RWLC and ONOF below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.

Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios.  Discover our library of Model portfolios

RWLC vs ONOF performance and flow charts

Performance

-3.0-2.0-1.00.01.02.03.0%Jul 6Jul 13Jul 20Jul 27Aug 3

Cumulative Flows

-5 M0 M5 M10 MJul 6Jul 13Jul 20Jul 27Aug 3

Get all the metrics on this page, and more, through a reliable ETF data feed

Daily, global ETF data for advanced analysis or integration into apps (API), from our partner Trackinsight.

Historic performance and flows
Data as of 08/05/2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y5Y
Perf.
RWLC
ONOF
+3.29%+2.10%
+7.27%+4.85%
+16.56%+9.48%
+22.03%+18.30%
+88.83%+42.01%
n/a+50.69%
Flows
RWLC
ONOF
-$2M-$726K
-$13M-$16M
-$33M-$13M
-$30M-$10M
-$17M+$12M
-+$18M
Volatility and drawdown
3M1Y3Y5Y
Volatility
RWLC
ONOF
+12.25%+14.17%
+12.38%+12.28%
+13.26%+14.40%
n/a+14.59%
Max drawdown
RWLC
ONOF
-4.61%-4.60%
-8.74%-6.75%
-15.40%-21.66%
n/a-25.41%
Max drawdown duration
RWLC
ONOF
37d62d
75d107d
85d205d
n/a756d
Trading data

Create an account to view trading data

Join for free
RWLC
ONOF
Last sale
8/6/2026 at 1:30 PM
$38.41
$41.30
Previous close
08/06/2026
$38.75
$40.99
Consolidated volume
08/06/2026
Average volume
30 days
Average discount or premium
30 days
Average Bid/Ask spread
30 days
Replication quality
Data as of July 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference

Create an account to view replication metrics

Join for free

RWLC
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an index

Create an account to view replication quality

Join for free
RWLC
ONOF
Tracking error
Tracking difference
1 year cumulative return difference
Best
Worst
Daily return difference
Average
Worst
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 8/6/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
RWLC
ONOF
Last price
$38.41
$41.30
1D performance
-0.89%
+0.77%
AuM$71.19 M$141.83 M
E/R0.32%0.39%
Characteristics
RWLC
ONOF
Management strategyActivePassive
ProviderRayliant Asset ManagementGlobal X
Benchmark-Adaptive Wealth Strategies U.S. Risk Management Index
N° of holdings98496
Asset class-Alternative
Trailing 12m distribution yield
Join
Join
Inception dateDecember 15, 2021January 13, 2021
ESGNoNo
Advertisement
Exposure

Countries

RWLC
USA
96.94%
Other
3.06%
ONOF
USA
97.14%
Other
2.86%

Sectors

RWLC
Technology
49.54%
Finance
12.72%
Healthcare
11.34%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
8.26%
Other
18.14%
ONOF
Technology
44.94%
Finance
12.97%
Healthcare
8.91%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
8.83%
Industrials
8.17%
Other
16.17%
Advertisement

Diversification

RWLC

Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15

49.69%
ONOF

Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15

41.97%

Top 15 holdings

Data as of June 30, 2026
RWLC
Apple, Inc.
8.43%
NVIDIA Corp.
6.30%
Micron Technology, Inc.
4.46%
Lam Research Corp.
4.16%
Alphabet, Inc.
4.04%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.59%
Western Digital Corp.
2.77%
Microsoft Corp.
2.53%
Mastercard, Inc.
2.45%
Amazon.com, Inc.
2.24%
Altria Group, Inc.
1.99%
Gilead Sciences, Inc.
1.79%
GE Vernova, Inc.
1.74%
Eli Lilly & Co.
1.63%
The Bank of New York Mellon Corp.
1.57%
ONOF
NVIDIA Corp.
7.05%
Apple, Inc.
6.23%
Microsoft Corp.
4.17%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.56%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.18%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.75%
Broadcom Inc.
2.68%
Tesla, Inc.
2.13%
Micron Technology, Inc.
2.00%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.91%
Eli Lilly & Co.
1.61%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.37%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
1.36%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.03%
Johnson & Johnson
0.95%
Frequently asked questions about RWLC and ONOF

How have the RWLC and ONOF ETFs performed in 2026?

As of August 5, 2026, RWLC is up 16.56% year-to-date (YTD), while ONOF has returned 9.48%. That puts RWLC better performer ahead so far this year.

Which ETF is attracting more investor money: RWLC or ONOF?

Year-to-date, the RWLC ETF saw -$33M in flows, compared to -$13M for ONOF.

Which ETF is more volatile: RWLC or ONOF?

Over the past year, RWLC had a volatility of 12.38%, while ONOF experienced 12.28%.

Which ETF is bigger: RWLC or ONOF?

As of August 5, 2026, RWLC holds $71.19 M in assets under management (AUM), while ONOF manages $141.83 M.

What sectors do the RWLC and ONOF ETFs invest in?

RWLC leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Healthcare. Meanwhile, ONOF focuses on Technology, Finance and Healthcare.

What are the top holdings of the RWLC ETF and ONOF ETF?

RWLC top holdings include Apple, Inc., NVIDIA Corp. and Micron Technology, Inc.. ONOF holds in its top three: NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc. and Microsoft Corp..

Which ETF is more diversified: RWLC or ONOF?

RWLC holds 100 securities with 49.69% of its assets in the top 15. ONOF has 500 securities and a top 15 weight of 41.97%.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
The Active Trader Report

Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up

Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.

Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up