RWLCvsIWBETF Comparison
ETF 1
RWLC
Rayliant Quantitative Developed Market Equity ETF
This fund is part of
Uncategorized Equities
+1.88%
VS
Rayliant Quantitative Developed Market Equity ETF (RWLC) belongs to the Uncategorized Equities segment. iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB) is part of the US Large Cap segment. RWLC's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Healthcare and Finance. In contrast, IWB's top sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Healthcare. RWLC is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.32%, versus 0.15% for IWB. RWLC is up 14.96% year-to-date (YTD) with -$43M in YTD flows. IWB performs worse with 13.04% YTD performance, and -$3.13B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of RWLC and IWB below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
RWLC vs IWB performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 11/03/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | RWLC IWB | -2.73%-0.91% | +0.45%-0.45% | +14.96%+13.04% | +14.67%+14.53% | +92.31%+81.53% | n/a+69.79% |
| Flows | RWLC IWB | -$11M-$310M | -$11M-$1.07B | -$43M-$3.13B | -$42M-$1.55B | -$25M-$3.19B | --$2.37B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | RWLC IWB | +9.25%+10.40% | +12.25%+12.97% | +13.08%+15.10% | n/a+17.32% |
| Max drawdown | RWLC IWB | -3.92%-3.37% | -8.74%-8.86% | -15.40%-19.16% | n/a-25.17% |
| Max drawdown duration | RWLC IWB | 23d29d | 75d76d | 85d126d | n/a709d |
Trading data
RWLC | IWB | |
Last sale 11/5/2026 at 2:30 PM | $37.13 | $401.06 |
| Previous close 11/04/2026 | $38.65 | $419.20 |
| Consolidated volume 11/04/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of October 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
RWLC
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexRWLC | IWB | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 11/5/2026 at 2:30 PM
Live
Closed
RWLC | IWB | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $37.13 | $401.06 |
| 1D performance | -3.95% | -4.33% |
| AuM | $60.70 M | $48.49 B |
| E/R | 0.32% | 0.15% |
Characteristics
RWLC | IWB | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Rayliant Asset Management | iShares |
| Benchmark | - | Russell 1000 Index |
| N° of holdings | 97 | 1012 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 15, 2021 | May 15, 2000 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
RWLC
USA
96.35%
Other
3.65%
IWB
USA
97.62%
Other
2.38%
Sectors
RWLC
Technology
49.54%
Healthcare
12.42%
Finance
12.29%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
7.36%
Other
18.39%
IWB
Technology
45.32%
Finance
13.38%
Healthcare
9.34%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
8.32%
Industrials
7.85%
Other
15.79%
Advertisement
Diversification
RWLC
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
47.53%
IWB
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
42.41%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of September 30, 2026
RWLC
Apple, Inc.
9.14%
NVIDIA Corp.
6.88%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.64%
Micron Technology, Inc.
3.26%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.23%
Microsoft Corp.
3.01%
Mastercard, Inc.
2.52%
Lam Research Corp.
2.30%
Amazon.com, Inc.
2.24%
Gilead Sciences, Inc.
2.05%
Eli Lilly & Co.
2.02%
Valero Energy Corp.
1.83%
Dell Technologies, Inc.
1.83%
Altria Group, Inc.
1.82%
Fortinet, Inc.
1.78%
IWB
NVIDIA Corp.
7.57%
Apple, Inc.
6.84%
Microsoft Corp.
5.41%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.43%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.85%
Broadcom Inc.
2.32%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.30%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
2.26%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.71%
Tesla, Inc.
1.47%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
1.41%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.32%
Eli Lilly & Co.
1.31%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.26%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp.
0.95%
Frequently asked questions about RWLC and IWB
How have the RWLC and IWB ETFs performed in 2026?
As of November 3, 2026, RWLC is up 14.96% year-to-date (YTD), while IWB has returned 13.04%. That puts RWLC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: RWLC or IWB?
Year-to-date, the RWLC ETF saw -$43M in flows, compared to -$3.13B for IWB.
Which ETF is more volatile: RWLC or IWB?
Over the past year, RWLC had a volatility of 12.25%, while IWB experienced 12.97%.
Which ETF is bigger: RWLC or IWB?
As of November 3, 2026, RWLC holds $60.70 M in assets under management (AUM), while IWB manages $48.49 B.
What sectors do the RWLC and IWB ETFs invest in?
RWLC leans toward sectors like Technology, Healthcare and Finance. Meanwhile, IWB focuses on Technology, Finance and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the RWLC ETF and IWB ETF?
RWLC top holdings include Apple, Inc., NVIDIA Corp. and Alphabet, Inc.. IWB holds in its top three: NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc. and Microsoft Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: RWLC or IWB?
RWLC holds 99 securities with 47.53% of its assets in the top 15. IWB has 1023 securities and a top 15 weight of 42.41%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
