RWLvsFNDXETF Comparison
VS
Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF (RWL) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF (FNDX) belong to the same industry segment: US Large Cap. RWL's top 3 sector exposures are Healthcare, Consumer Non-Cyclicals and Finance. In contrast, FNDX's top sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Healthcare. RWL is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.39%, versus 0.25% for FNDX. RWL is up 16.42% year-to-date (YTD) with +$1.21B in YTD flows. FNDX performs better with 17.97% YTD performance, and +$817M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of RWL and FNDX below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
RWL vs FNDX performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/28/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | RWL FNDX | +3.43%+2.37% | +8.70%+8.21% | +16.42%+17.97% | +27.62%+29.25% | +68.06%+69.05% | +92.52%+91.88% |
| Flows | RWL FNDX | +$163M+$291M | +$360M-$535M | +$1.21B+$817M | +$1.97B+$2.22B | +$5.02B+$5.56B | +$5.87B+$9.62B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | RWL FNDX | +9.05%+9.52% | +10.00%+10.48% | +12.39%+13.20% | +14.54%+15.18% |
| Max drawdown | RWL FNDX | -1.71%-2.21% | -6.70%-6.11% | -14.07%-16.26% | -17.55%-18.97% |
| Max drawdown duration | RWL FNDX | 16d7d | 46d63d | 127d131d | 468d545d |
Trading data
RWL | FNDX | |
Last sale 7/29/2026 at 1:30 PM | $131.04 | $31.54 |
| Previous close 07/28/2026 | $132.44 | $31.87 |
| Consolidated volume 07/28/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
RWL | FNDX | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/29/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
RWL | FNDX | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $131.04 | $31.54 |
| 1D performance | -1.06% | -1.04% |
| AuM | $9.73 B | $26.83 B |
| E/R | 0.39% | 0.25% |
Characteristics
RWL | FNDX | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Invesco | Schwab ETFs |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 Revenue-Weighted Index | RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US Large Index |
| N° of holdings | 497 | 704 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | February 22, 2008 | August 15, 2013 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
RWL
USA
96.94%
Other
3.06%
FNDX
USA
97.64%
Other
2.36%
Sectors
RWL
Healthcare
17.32%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
17.06%
Finance
16.58%
Technology
15.76%
Industrials
8.86%
Other
24.42%
FNDX
Technology
24.56%
Finance
16.8%
Healthcare
11.8%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
11%
Energy
9%
Industrials
7.65%
Other
19.19%
Advertisement
Diversification
RWL
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
29.92%
FNDX
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
27.5%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
RWL
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.72%
Walmart, Inc.
3.56%
UnitedHealth Group, Inc.
2.42%
Apple, Inc.
2.25%
CVS Health Corp.
2.22%
McKesson Corp.
1.99%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.98%
Cencora, Inc.
1.71%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.55%
Microsoft Corp.
1.53%
Exxon Mobil Corp.
1.53%
Costco Wholesale Corp.
1.45%
Cardinal Health, Inc.
1.41%
The Cigna Group
1.36%
NVIDIA Corp.
1.25%
FNDX
Apple, Inc.
4.49%
Intel Corp.
2.28%
Exxon Mobil Corp.
2.25%
Microsoft Corp.
2.20%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.97%
Amazon.com, Inc.
1.76%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.71%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.65%
UnitedHealth Group, Inc.
1.62%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.57%
Chevron Corp.
1.45%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.29%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.14%
Walmart, Inc.
1.09%
Johnson & Johnson
1.05%
Frequently asked questions about RWL and FNDX
How have the RWL and FNDX ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 28, 2026, RWL is up 16.42% year-to-date (YTD), while FNDX has returned 17.97%. That puts FNDX better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: RWL or FNDX?
Year-to-date, the RWL ETF saw +$1.21B in flows, compared to +$817M for FNDX.
Which ETF is more volatile: RWL or FNDX?
Over the past year, RWL had a volatility of 10%, while FNDX experienced 10.48%.
Which ETF is bigger: RWL or FNDX?
As of July 28, 2026, RWL holds $9.73 B in assets under management (AUM), while FNDX manages $26.83 B.
What sectors do the RWL and FNDX ETFs invest in?
RWL leans toward sectors like Healthcare, Consumer Non-Cyclicals and Finance. Meanwhile, FNDX focuses on Technology, Finance and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the RWL ETF and FNDX ETF?
RWL top holdings include Amazon.com, Inc., Walmart, Inc. and UnitedHealth Group, Inc.. FNDX holds in its top three: Apple, Inc., Intel Corp. and Exxon Mobil Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: RWL or FNDX?
RWL holds 504 securities with 29.92% of its assets in the top 15. FNDX has 707 securities and a top 15 weight of 27.5%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
