Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
RWJvsEBITETF Comparison
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF (RWJ) and Harbor AlphaEdge Small Cap Earners ETF (EBIT) belong to the same industry segment: US Small Cap. RWJ's top 3 sector exposures are Consumer Discretionary, Industrials and Financials. In contrast, EBIT's top sector exposures are Financials, Consumer Discretionary and Industrials. RWJ is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.39%, versus 0.29% for EBIT. RWJ is up 3.09% year-to-date (YTD) with +$23M in YTD flows. EBIT performs better with 4.23% YTD performance, and +$2M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of RWJ and EBIT below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
RWJ vs EBIT performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | RWJ EBIT | -7.45%-5.02% | -0.50%+1.21% | +3.09%+4.23% | +23.21%+20.08% | +44.01%n/a | +30.66%n/a |
| Flows | RWJ EBIT | +$10M+$2M | +$29M+$2M | +$23M+$2M | -$272M+$931K | +$52M- | +$814M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | RWJ EBIT | +18.31%+16.06% | +25.43%+22.25% | +22.64%n/a | +23.88%n/a |
| Max drawdown | RWJ EBIT | -8.39%-5.25% | -17.73%-14.95% | -29.24%n/a | -29.24%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | RWJ EBIT | 31d16d | 52d46d | 289dn/a | 289dn/a |
RWJ | EBIT | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $49.23 | $34.38 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $50.18 | $34.89 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
RWJ | EBIT | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
RWJ | EBIT | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $49.23 | $34.38 |
| 1D performance | -1.89% | -1.48% |
| AuM | $1.63 B | $11.37 M |
| E/R | 0.39% | 0.29% |
RWJ | EBIT | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Invesco | Harbor Capital |
| Benchmark | S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue-Weighted Index | Harbor AlphaEdge Small Cap Earners Index |
| N° of holdings | 558 | 612 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | February 22, 2008 | July 10, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the RWJ and EBIT ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, RWJ is up 3.09% year-to-date (YTD), while EBIT has returned 4.23%. That puts EBIT better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: RWJ or EBIT?
Year-to-date, the RWJ ETF saw +$23M in flows, compared to +$2M for EBIT.
Which ETF is more volatile: RWJ or EBIT?
Over the past year, RWJ had a volatility of 25.43%, while EBIT experienced 22.25%.
Which ETF is bigger: RWJ or EBIT?
As of March 11, 2026, RWJ holds $1.63 B in assets under management (AUM), while EBIT manages $11.37 M.
What sectors do the RWJ and EBIT ETFs invest in?
RWJ leans toward sectors like Consumer Discretionary, Industrials and Financials. Meanwhile, EBIT focuses on Financials, Consumer Discretionary and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the RWJ ETF and EBIT ETF?
RWJ top holdings include WORLD FUEL SERVICES, UNITED NATURAL FOODS and CARMAX. EBIT holds in its top three: NAVIENT CORPORATION COM, STONEX GROUP INC and JOHN WILEY SONS.
Which ETF is more diversified: RWJ or EBIT?
RWJ holds 601 securities with 19.95% of its assets in the top 15. EBIT has 618 securities and a top 15 weight of 10.19%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
