Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
RWJvsDGRSETF Comparison
WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Fund
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF (RWJ) belongs to the US Small Cap segment. WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRS) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. RWJ's top 3 sector exposures are Consumer Discretionary, Industrials and Financials. In contrast, DGRS's top sector exposures are Financials, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary. RWJ is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.39%, versus 0.38% for DGRS. RWJ is up 3.09% year-to-date (YTD) with +$23M in YTD flows. DGRS performs better with 7.01% YTD performance, and +$196K in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of RWJ and DGRS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
RWJ vs DGRS performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | RWJ DGRS | -7.45%-5.61% | -0.50%+3.36% | +3.09%+7.01% | +23.21%+15.47% | +44.01%+40.46% | +30.66%+27.16% |
| Flows | RWJ DGRS | +$10M+$6M | +$29M-$4M | +$23M+$196K | -$272M-$90M | +$52M+$66M | +$814M+$135M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | RWJ DGRS | +18.31%+16.55% | +25.43%+22.65% | +22.64%+20.37% | +23.88%+20.67% |
| Max drawdown | RWJ DGRS | -8.39%-5.91% | -17.73%-14.81% | -29.24%-27.66% | -29.24%-27.66% |
| Max drawdown duration | RWJ DGRS | 31d30d | 52d98d | 289d435d | 289d435d |
RWJ | DGRS | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $49.23 | $52.24 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $50.18 | $53.05 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
RWJ | DGRS | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
RWJ | DGRS | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $49.23 | $52.24 |
| 1D performance | -1.89% | -1.53% |
| AuM | $1.63 B | $363.64 M |
| E/R | 0.39% | 0.38% |
RWJ | DGRS | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Invesco | WisdomTree |
| Benchmark | S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue-Weighted Index | WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Index |
| N° of holdings | 558 | 195 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | February 22, 2008 | July 25, 2013 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the RWJ and DGRS ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, RWJ is up 3.09% year-to-date (YTD), while DGRS has returned 7.01%. That puts DGRS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: RWJ or DGRS?
Year-to-date, the RWJ ETF saw +$23M in flows, compared to +$196K for DGRS.
Which ETF is more volatile: RWJ or DGRS?
Over the past year, RWJ had a volatility of 25.43%, while DGRS experienced 22.65%.
Which ETF is bigger: RWJ or DGRS?
As of March 11, 2026, RWJ holds $1.63 B in assets under management (AUM), while DGRS manages $363.64 M.
What sectors do the RWJ and DGRS ETFs invest in?
RWJ leans toward sectors like Consumer Discretionary, Industrials and Financials. Meanwhile, DGRS focuses on Financials, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the RWJ ETF and DGRS ETF?
RWJ top holdings include WORLD FUEL SERVICES, UNITED NATURAL FOODS and CARMAX. DGRS holds in its top three: ARCHROCK, CAL MAINE FOODS and CALIFORNIA RESOURCES.
Which ETF is more diversified: RWJ or DGRS?
RWJ holds 601 securities with 19.95% of its assets in the top 15. DGRS has 202 securities and a top 15 weight of 24.62%.
Have you tried our ETF Compare tool?
Compare ETFs like a pro. Analyze fees, performance, exposure & holdings side-by-side.