New

ETF model portfolios designed for real investor needs. Discover →

Advertisement
Advertisement

RWEMvsGEMETF Comparison

ETF 1
RWEM

Rayliant Quantamental Emerging Market Equity ETF

This fund is part of
Uncategorized Equities
-1.3%
VS
ETF 2
GEM

Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF

This fund is part of
EM Large & Mid Cap
-1.48%

Rayliant Quantamental Emerging Market Equity ETF (RWEM) belongs to the Uncategorized Equities segment. Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF (GEM) is part of the EM Large & Mid Cap segment. RWEM's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Consumer Cyclicals. In contrast, GEM's top sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Non-Energy Materials. RWEM is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.52%, versus 0.59% for GEM. RWEM is up 25.54% year-to-date (YTD) with -$25M in YTD flows. GEM performs worse with 25.46% YTD performance, and +$283M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of RWEM and GEM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.

Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios.  Discover our library of Model portfolios

RWEM vs GEM performance and flow charts

Performance

0.01.02.03.04.05.06.0%Aug 10Aug 17Aug 24Aug 31Sep 7

Cumulative Flows

0 M5 M10 M15 M20 MAug 10Aug 17Aug 24Aug 31Sep 7

Get all the metrics on this page, and more, through a reliable ETF data feed

Daily, global ETF data for advanced analysis or integration into apps (API), from our partner Trackinsight.

Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/10/2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y5Y
Perf.
RWEM
GEM
+4.78%+4.33%
+5.64%+5.15%
+25.54%+25.46%
+36.21%+34.31%
+84.08%+86.88%
n/a+50.36%
Flows
RWEM
GEM
-$3K+$24M
+$2M+$107M
-$25M+$283M
-$27M+$326M
-$2M+$170M
-+$105M
Volatility and drawdown
3M1Y3Y5Y
Volatility
RWEM
GEM
+23.47%+25.26%
+22.10%+22.80%
+17.46%+17.35%
n/a+16.64%
Max drawdown
RWEM
GEM
-11.33%-12.49%
-13.18%-13.50%
-23.02%-14.73%
n/a-32.15%
Max drawdown duration
RWEM
GEM
80d80d
57d57d
270d223d
n/a1361d
Trading data

Create an account to view trading data

Join for free
RWEM
GEM
Last sale
9/11/2026 at 1:30 PM
$36.77
$51.83
Previous close
09/10/2026
$36.50
$51.18
Consolidated volume
09/10/2026
Average volume
30 days
Average discount or premium
30 days
Average Bid/Ask spread
30 days
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference

Create an account to view replication metrics

Join for free

RWEM
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an index

Create an account to view replication quality

Join for free
RWEM
GEM
Tracking error
Tracking difference
1 year cumulative return difference
Best
Worst
Daily return difference
Average
Worst
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/11/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
RWEM
GEM
Last price
$36.77
$51.83
1D performance
+0.74%
+1.27%
AuM$74.13 M$1.80 B
E/R0.52%0.59%
Characteristics
RWEM
GEM
Management strategyActivePassive
ProviderRayliant Asset ManagementGoldman Sachs
Benchmark-Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity Index
N° of holdings215718
Asset class-Equities
Trailing 12m distribution yield
Join
Join
Inception dateDecember 15, 2021September 25, 2015
ESGNoNo
Advertisement
Exposure

Countries

RWEM
China
24.46%
Taiwan
24.24%
Republic of Korea
20.53%
India
10.08%
Other
20.69%
GEM
Taiwan
23.15%
China
18.31%
Republic of Korea
17.59%
India
10.1%
Other
30.86%

Sectors

RWEM
Technology
46.69%
Finance
21.04%
Other
32.27%
GEM
Technology
39.22%
Finance
20.2%
Other
40.59%
Advertisement

Diversification

RWEM

Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15

40.51%
GEM

Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15

34.32%

Top 15 holdings

Data as of July 31, 2026
RWEM
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
9.20%
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
5.93%
SK hynix, Inc.
4.21%
Tencent Holdings Ltd.
4.05%
Delta Electronics, Inc.
2.53%
MediaTek, Inc.
1.88%
NetEase, Inc.
1.83%
LG Corp.
1.70%
Zhejiang Century Huatong Group Co., Ltd.
1.63%
ASUSTek Computer, Inc.
1.36%
Geely Automobile Holdings Ltd.
1.32%
PICC Property & Casualty Co., Ltd.
1.24%
Accton Technology Corp.
1.22%
Agricultural Bank of China Ltd.
1.21%
Woori Financial Group, Inc.
1.20%
GEM
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
13.34%
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
5.97%
SK hynix, Inc.
4.52%
Tencent Holdings Ltd.
2.68%
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.
1.66%
MediaTek, Inc.
1.27%
China Construction Bank Corp.
0.75%
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
0.72%
Delta Electronics, Inc.
0.69%
ICICI Bank Ltd.
0.50%
HDFC Bank Ltd.
0.50%
Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd.
0.48%
Samsung Electro-Mechanics Co., Ltd.
0.46%
Reliance Industries Ltd.
0.39%
Itaú Unibanco Holding SA
0.39%
Frequently asked questions about RWEM and GEM

How have the RWEM and GEM ETFs performed in 2026?

As of September 10, 2026, RWEM is up 25.54% year-to-date (YTD), while GEM has returned 25.46%. That puts RWEM better performer ahead so far this year.

Which ETF is attracting more investor money: RWEM or GEM?

Year-to-date, the RWEM ETF saw -$25M in flows, compared to +$283M for GEM.

Which ETF is more volatile: RWEM or GEM?

Over the past year, RWEM had a volatility of 22.1%, while GEM experienced 22.8%.

Which ETF is bigger: RWEM or GEM?

As of September 10, 2026, RWEM holds $74.13 M in assets under management (AUM), while GEM manages $1.80 B.

What sectors do the RWEM and GEM ETFs invest in?

RWEM leans toward sectors like Technology and Finance. Meanwhile, GEM focuses on Technology and Finance.

What are the top holdings of the RWEM ETF and GEM ETF?

RWEM top holdings include Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and SK hynix, Inc.. GEM holds in its top three: Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and SK hynix, Inc..

Which ETF is more diversified: RWEM or GEM?

RWEM holds 220 securities with 40.51% of its assets in the top 15. GEM has 740 securities and a top 15 weight of 34.32%.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
The Active Trader Report

Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up

Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.

Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up