RVERvsQOWZETF Comparison
VS
Trenchless Fund ETF (RVER) and Invesco Nasdaq Free Cash Flow Achievers ETF (QOWZ) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. RVER's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Industrials and Non-Energy Materials. In contrast, QOWZ's top sector exposures are Technology, Business Services and Healthcare. RVER is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.66%, versus 0.39% for QOWZ. RVER is up 7.8% year-to-date (YTD) with +$17M in YTD flows. QOWZ performs worse with -2.18% YTD performance, and -$2M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of RVER and QOWZ below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
RVER vs QOWZ performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/30/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | RVER QOWZ | -4.72%+2.93% | +11.17%+5.94% | +7.80%-2.18% | +8.30%-3.68% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | RVER QOWZ | -$1M- | -$4M-$2M | +$17M-$2M | +$36M-$3M | -- | -- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | RVER QOWZ | +28.26%+16.70% | +24.08%+15.77% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | RVER QOWZ | -14.77%-8.53% | -21.55%-17.83% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | RVER QOWZ | 58d59d | 231d275d | n/an/a | n/an/a |
Trading data
RVER | QOWZ | |
Last sale 7/31/2026 at 1:30 PM | $33.67 | $35.33 |
| Previous close 07/30/2026 | $33.35 | $34.99 |
| Consolidated volume 07/30/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
RVER
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexRVER | QOWZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/31/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
RVER | QOWZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $33.67 | $35.33 |
| 1D performance | +0.96% | +0.97% |
| AuM | $133.07 M | $11.89 M |
| E/R | 0.66% | 0.39% |
Characteristics
RVER | QOWZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | R1VER Asset Management | Invesco |
| Benchmark | - | Nasdaq US Free Cash Flow Achievers Index |
| N° of holdings | 18 | 50 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | April 3, 2024 | December 5, 2023 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
RVER
USA
87.26%
Other
12.74%
QOWZ
USA
98.36%
Other
1.64%
Sectors
RVER
Technology
42.61%
Industrials
13.43%
Non-Energy Materi.
10.78%
Energy
10.1%
Healthcare
7.11%
Other
15.97%
QOWZ
Technology
52.17%
Business Services
12.42%
Healthcare
10.77%
Industrials
10.09%
Other
14.55%
Advertisement
Diversification
RVER
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
81.19%
QOWZ
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
51.82%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
RVER
NVIDIA Corp.
11.00%
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co.
7.52%
ImmunityBio, Inc.
7.11%
EQT Corp.
7.11%
Broadcom Inc.
5.78%
Uber Technologies, Inc.
4.97%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
4.92%
First Solar, Inc.
4.90%
Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
4.83%
Snowflake, Inc.
4.35%
ServiceNow, Inc.
4.21%
Coeur Mining, Inc.
4.15%
Fluence Energy, Inc.
3.56%
Royal Gold, Inc.
3.55%
SoFi Technologies, Inc.
3.23%
QOWZ
NVIDIA Corp.
9.53%
Broadcom Inc.
6.33%
KLA Corp.
4.87%
Mastercard, Inc.
4.58%
Fortinet, Inc.
3.03%
Cadence Design Systems, Inc.
2.80%
Automatic Data Processing, Inc.
2.67%
Salesforce, Inc.
2.66%
Republic Services, Inc.
2.52%
ServiceNow, Inc.
2.37%
Adobe, Inc.
2.19%
Intuit, Inc.
2.15%
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
2.11%
IDEXX Laboratories, Inc.
2.05%
Roper Technologies, Inc.
1.96%
Frequently asked questions about RVER and QOWZ
How have the RVER and QOWZ ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 30, 2026, RVER is up 7.8% year-to-date (YTD), while QOWZ has lost -2.18%. That puts RVER better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: RVER or QOWZ?
Year-to-date, the RVER ETF saw +$17M in flows, compared to -$2M for QOWZ.
Which ETF is more volatile: RVER or QOWZ?
Over the past year, RVER had a volatility of 24.08%, while QOWZ experienced 15.77%.
Which ETF is bigger: RVER or QOWZ?
As of July 30, 2026, RVER holds $133.07 M in assets under management (AUM), while QOWZ manages $11.89 M.
What sectors do the RVER and QOWZ ETFs invest in?
RVER leans toward sectors like Technology, Industrials and Non-Energy Materials. Meanwhile, QOWZ focuses on Technology, Business Services and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the RVER ETF and QOWZ ETF?
RVER top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co. and ImmunityBio, Inc.. QOWZ holds in its top three: NVIDIA Corp., Broadcom Inc. and KLA Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: RVER or QOWZ?
RVER holds 18 securities with 81.19% of its assets in the top 15. QOWZ has 50 securities and a top 15 weight of 51.82%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
