RVERvsHQGOETF Comparison
VS
Trenchless Fund ETF (RVER) and Hartford US Quality Growth ETF (HQGO) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. RVER's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Industrials and Non-Energy Materials. In contrast, HQGO's top sector exposures are Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals and Healthcare. RVER is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.66%, versus 0.34% for HQGO. RVER is up 7.8% year-to-date (YTD) with +$17M in YTD flows. HQGO performs better with 8.28% YTD performance, and -$4M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of RVER and HQGO below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
RVER vs HQGO performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/30/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | RVER HQGO | -4.72%-0.82% | +11.17%+4.43% | +7.80%+8.28% | +8.30%+17.39% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | RVER HQGO | -$1M- | -$4M-$2M | +$17M-$4M | +$36M-$4M | -- | -- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | RVER HQGO | +28.26%+13.87% | +24.08%+14.23% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | RVER HQGO | -14.77%-5.25% | -21.55%-10.39% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | RVER HQGO | 58d59d | 231d94d | n/an/a | n/an/a |
Trading data
RVER | HQGO | |
Last sale 7/30/2026 at 7:59 PM | $33.35 | $64.94 |
| Previous close 07/30/2026 | $32.13 | $64.36 |
| Consolidated volume 07/30/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
RVER
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexRVER | HQGO | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/30/2026 at 7:59 PM
Live
Closed
RVER | HQGO | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $33.35 | $64.94 |
| 1D performance | +3.80% | +0.90% |
| AuM | $133.07 M | $48.68 M |
| E/R | 0.66% | 0.34% |
Characteristics
RVER | HQGO | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | R1VER Asset Management | Hartford Funds |
| Benchmark | - | Hartford US Quality Growth Index |
| N° of holdings | 18 | 162 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | April 3, 2024 | December 5, 2023 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
RVER
USA
87.26%
Other
12.74%
HQGO
USA
98.8%
Other
1.2%
Sectors
RVER
Technology
42.61%
Industrials
13.43%
Non-Energy Materi.
10.78%
Energy
10.1%
Healthcare
7.11%
Other
15.97%
HQGO
Technology
51.16%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
10.58%
Healthcare
10.37%
Finance
7.51%
Other
20.38%
Diversification
RVER
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
81.19%
HQGO
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
45.08%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
RVER
NVIDIA Corp.
11.00%
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co.
7.52%
ImmunityBio, Inc.
7.11%
EQT Corp.
7.11%
Broadcom Inc.
5.78%
Uber Technologies, Inc.
4.97%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
4.92%
First Solar, Inc.
4.90%
Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
4.83%
Snowflake, Inc.
4.35%
ServiceNow, Inc.
4.21%
Coeur Mining, Inc.
4.15%
Fluence Energy, Inc.
3.56%
Royal Gold, Inc.
3.55%
SoFi Technologies, Inc.
3.23%
HQGO
NVIDIA Corp.
5.24%
Alphabet, Inc.
4.90%
Apple, Inc.
4.87%
Amazon.com, Inc.
4.60%
Microsoft Corp.
3.80%
Broadcom Inc.
3.46%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
2.66%
Tesla, Inc.
2.23%
Eli Lilly & Co.
2.12%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
2.05%
Visa, Inc.
1.94%
Johnson & Johnson
1.89%
Seagate Technology Holdings Plc
1.83%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.83%
Walmart, Inc.
1.66%
Frequently asked questions about RVER and HQGO
How have the RVER and HQGO ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 30, 2026, RVER is up 7.8% year-to-date (YTD), while HQGO has returned 8.28%. That puts HQGO better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: RVER or HQGO?
Year-to-date, the RVER ETF saw +$17M in flows, compared to -$4M for HQGO.
Which ETF is more volatile: RVER or HQGO?
Over the past year, RVER had a volatility of 24.08%, while HQGO experienced 14.23%.
Which ETF is bigger: RVER or HQGO?
As of July 30, 2026, RVER holds $133.07 M in assets under management (AUM), while HQGO manages $48.68 M.
What sectors do the RVER and HQGO ETFs invest in?
RVER leans toward sectors like Technology, Industrials and Non-Energy Materials. Meanwhile, HQGO focuses on Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the RVER ETF and HQGO ETF?
RVER top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co. and ImmunityBio, Inc.. HQGO holds in its top three: NVIDIA Corp., Alphabet, Inc. and Apple, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: RVER or HQGO?
RVER holds 18 securities with 81.19% of its assets in the top 15. HQGO has 162 securities and a top 15 weight of 45.08%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
