Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
RSSLvsVTWOETF Comparison
Global X Russell 2000 ETF (RSSL) and Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF (VTWO) belong to the same industry segment: US Small Cap. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Industrials, Health Care and Financials. RSSL is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.08%, versus 0.06% for VTWO. RSSL is up 0.46% year-to-date (YTD) with -$28M in YTD flows. VTWO performs better with 0.48% YTD performance, and +$71M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of RSSL and VTWO below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
RSSL vs VTWO performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | RSSL VTWO | -4.73%-4.73% | -2.18%-2.16% | +0.46%+0.48% | +24.40%+24.55% | n/a+49.09% | n/a+13.38% |
| Flows | RSSL VTWO | +$8M+$470M | -$78M+$196M | -$28M+$71M | -$381M+$536M | -+$4.85B | -+$7.21B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | RSSL VTWO | +18.43%+18.44% | +23.16%+23.16% | n/a+21.10% | n/a+22.69% |
| Max drawdown | RSSL VTWO | -8.31%-8.30% | -16.46%-16.46% | n/a-27.51% | n/a-31.93% |
| Max drawdown duration | RSSL VTWO | 49d49d | 52d52d | n/a289d | n/a1093d |
RSSL | VTWO | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $96.89 | $100.03 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $99.05 | $102.22 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
RSSL | VTWO | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
RSSL | VTWO | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $96.89 | $100.03 |
| 1D performance | -2.19% | -2.14% |
| AuM | $1.33 B | $13.93 B |
| E/R | 0.08% | 0.06% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the RSSL and VTWO ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, RSSL is up 0.46% year-to-date (YTD), while VTWO has returned 0.48%. That puts VTWO better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: RSSL or VTWO?
Year-to-date, the RSSL ETF saw -$28M in flows, compared to +$71M for VTWO.
Which ETF is more volatile: RSSL or VTWO?
Over the past year, RSSL had a volatility of 23.16%, while VTWO experienced 23.16%.
Which ETF is bigger: RSSL or VTWO?
As of March 12, 2026, RSSL holds $1.33 B in assets under management (AUM), while VTWO manages $13.93 B.
What sectors do the RSSL and VTWO ETFs invest in?
RSSL leans toward sectors like Industrials, Health Care and Financials. Meanwhile, VTWO focuses on Industrials, Health Care and Financials.
What are the top holdings of the RSSL ETF and VTWO ETF?
RSSL top holdings include BLOOM ENERGY CORP, CREDO TECHNOLOGY GROUP HOLDING and KRATOS DEFENSE AND SECURITY SOLS. VTWO holds in its top three: BLOOM ENERGY CORP, CREDO TECHNOLOGY GROUP HOLDING and FABRINET.
Which ETF is more diversified: RSSL or VTWO?
RSSL holds 1883 securities with 7.74% of its assets in the top 15. VTWO has 1958 securities and a top 15 weight of 7.4%.
Will 2024 be the Year of Small Caps and Value Stocks?
Value ETFs Shine Amid Lower-Than-Expected Inflation
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
