Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
RSPMvsFMATETF Comparison
Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Materials ETF (RSPM) and Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF (FMAT) belong to the same industry segment: US Materials. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: and Materials. RSPM is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.4%, versus 0.08% for FMAT. RSPM is up 11.98% year-to-date (YTD) with +$4M in YTD flows. FMAT performs worse with 9.57% YTD performance, and +$33M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of RSPM and FMAT below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
RSPM vs FMAT performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | RSPM FMAT | -5.83%-4.43% | +14.70%+14.78% | +11.98%+9.57% | +21.74%+21.93% | +27.32%+35.14% | +35.02%+47.59% |
| Flows | RSPM FMAT | +$5M+$9M | +$6M+$43M | +$4M+$33M | -$40M-$79M | -$212M-$17M | -$469M+$78M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | RSPM FMAT | +19.07%+19.91% | +22.32%+21.05% | +18.59%+17.64% | +19.98%+19.56% |
| Max drawdown | RSPM FMAT | -7.32%-7.30% | -16.44%-14.66% | -27.09%-23.21% | -27.09%-25.40% |
| Max drawdown duration | RSPM FMAT | 27d8d | 76d57d | 470d430d | 470d679d |
RSPM | FMAT | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $38.28 | $58.02 |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $38.10 | $58.20 |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
RSPM | FMAT | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
RSPM | FMAT | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $38.28 | $58.02 |
| 1D performance | +0.47% | -0.31% |
| AuM | $175.30 M | $532.48 M |
| E/R | 0.4% | 0.08% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the RSPM and FMAT ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, RSPM is up 11.98% year-to-date (YTD), while FMAT has returned 9.57%. That puts RSPM better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: RSPM or FMAT?
Year-to-date, the RSPM ETF saw +$4M in flows, compared to +$33M for FMAT.
Which ETF is more volatile: RSPM or FMAT?
Over the past year, RSPM had a volatility of 22.32%, while FMAT experienced 21.05%.
Which ETF is bigger: RSPM or FMAT?
As of March 10, 2026, RSPM holds $175.30 M in assets under management (AUM), while FMAT manages $532.48 M.
What sectors do the RSPM and FMAT ETFs invest in?
RSPM leans toward sectors like Materials. Meanwhile, FMAT focuses on Materials.
What are the top holdings of the RSPM ETF and FMAT ETF?
RSPM top holdings include ALBEMARLE, NEWMONT CORP and FREEPORT-MCMORAN INC. FMAT holds in its top three: IE000S9YS762, NEWMONT CORP and FREEPORT-MCMORAN INC.
Which ETF is more diversified: RSPM or FMAT?
RSPM holds 26 securities with 60.56% of its assets in the top 15. FMAT has 105 securities and a top 15 weight of 65.23%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
