Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
RSPDvsIYCETF Comparison
Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF
Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF (RSPD) and iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF (IYC) belong to the same industry segment: US Cons. Discretionary. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: and Consumer Discretionary. RSPD is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.4%, versus 0.38% for IYC. RSPD is down -4.68% year-to-date (YTD) with +$52M in YTD flows. IYC performs better with -4.6% YTD performance, and -$347M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of RSPD and IYC below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
RSPD vs IYC performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | RSPD IYC | -7.79%-2.75% | -6.01%-5.73% | -4.68%-4.60% | +9.59%+12.55% | +37.91%+66.51% | +21.33%+34.16% |
| Flows | RSPD IYC | +$64M-$183M | +$58M-$310M | +$52M-$347M | -$36M-$416M | -$388M+$73M | -$476M-$485M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | RSPD IYC | +16.70%+13.43% | +22.65%+20.48% | +18.82%+17.48% | +21.92%+20.68% |
| Max drawdown | RSPD IYC | -9.42%-8.26% | -14.36%-13.37% | -21.07%-21.64% | -34.36%-35.92% |
| Max drawdown duration | RSPD IYC | 58d58d | 46d37d | 213d212d | 1044d1044d |
RSPD | IYC | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $54.11 | $98.04 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $54.34 | $98.33 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
RSPD | IYC | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
RSPD | IYC | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $54.11 | $98.04 |
| 1D performance | -0.42% | -0.29% |
| AuM | $264.09 M | $1.19 B |
| E/R | 0.4% | 0.38% |
RSPD | IYC | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Invesco | iShares |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary Index | Russell 1000 Consumer Discretionary 40 Act 15/22.5 Daily Capped Index |
| N° of holdings | 48 | 149 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | November 1, 2006 | June 12, 2000 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the RSPD and IYC ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, RSPD is down -4.68% year-to-date (YTD), while IYC has lost -4.6%. That puts IYC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: RSPD or IYC?
Year-to-date, the RSPD ETF saw +$52M in flows, compared to -$347M for IYC.
Which ETF is more volatile: RSPD or IYC?
Over the past year, RSPD had a volatility of 22.65%, while IYC experienced 20.48%.
Which ETF is bigger: RSPD or IYC?
As of March 12, 2026, RSPD holds $264.09 M in assets under management (AUM), while IYC manages $1.19 B.
What sectors do the RSPD and IYC ETFs invest in?
RSPD leans toward sectors like Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, IYC focuses on Consumer Discretionary, Communication Services and Consumer Staples.
What are the top holdings of the RSPD ETF and IYC ETF?
RSPD top holdings include CHIPOTLE MEXICAN GRILL, STARBUCKS-T and EBAY. IYC holds in its top three: AMAZON.COM INC, TESLA and WALMART INC.
Which ETF is more diversified: RSPD or IYC?
RSPD holds 48 securities with 33.7% of its assets in the top 15. IYC has 167 securities and a top 15 weight of 60.29%.
Tony's ETF Buyers Guide: Equal-Weight ETFs
Consumer Discretionary Funds Weighed Down by Tesla Stocks
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
