Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
RSMCvsFSGSETF Comparison
Rockefeller U.S. Small-Mid Cap ETF (RSMC) and First Trust SMID Growth Strength ETF (FSGS) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Industrials, Information Technology and Financials. RSMC is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.75%, versus 0.61% for FSGS. RSMC is down -2.62% year-to-date (YTD) with -$10M in YTD flows. FSGS performs worse with -3.85% YTD performance, and +$2M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of RSMC and FSGS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
RSMC vs FSGS performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | RSMC FSGS | -7.48%-2.75% | -4.12%-5.80% | -2.62%-3.85% | +8.32%+8.38% | n/a+19.37% | n/a+7.54% |
| Flows | RSMC FSGS | +$7M- | -$11M-$1M | -$10M+$2M | -$56M-$2M | --$3M | -+$17M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | RSMC FSGS | +17.97%+14.89% | +21.30%+19.81% | n/a+19.28% | n/a+20.34% |
| Max drawdown | RSMC FSGS | -9.22%-8.79% | -13.13%-12.54% | n/a-23.71% | n/a-23.71% |
| Max drawdown duration | RSMC FSGS | 50d49d | 37d38d | n/a472d | n/a472d |
RSMC | FSGS | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $24.64 | $29.30 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $24.62 | $29.24 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
RSMC | FSGS | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
RSMC | FSGS | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $24.64 | $29.30 |
| 1D performance | +0.06% | +0.19% |
| AuM | $678.64 M | $27.80 M |
| E/R | 0.75% | 0.61% |
RSMC | FSGS | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Rockefeller Asset Management | First Trust |
| Benchmark | - | The SMID Growth Strength Index |
| N° of holdings | 43 | 99 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 10, 2024 | June 20, 2017 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the RSMC and FSGS ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 13, 2026, RSMC is down -2.62% year-to-date (YTD), while FSGS has lost -3.85%. That puts RSMC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: RSMC or FSGS?
Year-to-date, the RSMC ETF saw -$10M in flows, compared to +$2M for FSGS.
Which ETF is more volatile: RSMC or FSGS?
Over the past year, RSMC had a volatility of 21.3%, while FSGS experienced 19.81%.
Which ETF is bigger: RSMC or FSGS?
As of March 13, 2026, RSMC holds $678.64 M in assets under management (AUM), while FSGS manages $27.80 M.
What sectors do the RSMC and FSGS ETFs invest in?
RSMC leans toward sectors like Industrials, Information Technology and Financials. Meanwhile, FSGS focuses on Industrials, Information Technology and Financials.
What are the top holdings of the RSMC ETF and FSGS ETF?
RSMC top holdings include FIRSTCASH HOLDINGS INC, STONEX GROUP INC and BADGER METER. FSGS holds in its top three: STRIDE INC, DECKERS OUTDOOR and CORCEPT THERAPEUTICS.
Which ETF is more diversified: RSMC or FSGS?
RSMC holds 44 securities with 46.22% of its assets in the top 15. FSGS has 99 securities and a top 15 weight of 16.56%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
