RSMCvsFSGSETF Comparison
VS
Rockefeller U.S. Small-Mid Cap ETF (RSMC) and First Trust SMID Growth Strength ETF (FSGS) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Industrials, Information Technology and Financials. RSMC is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.75%, versus 0.61% for FSGS. RSMC is up 7.22% year-to-date (YTD) with -$13M in YTD flows. FSGS performs worse with 1.65% YTD performance, and +$2M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of RSMC and FSGS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
RSMC vs FSGS performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 04/28/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | RSMC FSGS | +11.95%+8.57% | +3.25%-1.99% | +7.22%+1.65% | +14.77%+13.25% | n/a+25.67% | n/a+15.05% |
| Flows | RSMC FSGS | -$315K- | -$2M+$2M | -$13M+$2M | -$45M-$2M | --$4M | -+$18M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | RSMC FSGS | +19.04%+17.49% | +17.01%+15.63% | n/a+19.23% | n/a+20.26% |
| Max drawdown | RSMC FSGS | -9.30%-9.89% | -10.66%-11.35% | n/a-23.71% | n/a-23.71% |
| Max drawdown duration | RSMC FSGS | 64d90d | 84d95d | n/a518d | n/a518d |
Trading data
RSMC | FSGS | |
Last sale 4/29/2026 at 3:14 PM | $26.97 | $30.65 |
| Previous close 04/28/2026 | $27.12 | $30.94 |
| Consolidated volume 04/28/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of March 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
RSMC
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexRSMC | FSGS | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 4/29/2026 at 3:14 PM
Live
Closed
RSMC | FSGS | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $26.97 | $30.65 |
| 1D performance | -0.55% | -0.94% |
| AuM | $744.73 M | $29.38 M |
| E/R | 0.75% | 0.61% |
Characteristics
RSMC | FSGS | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Rockefeller Asset Management | First Trust |
| Benchmark | - | The SMID Growth Strength Index |
| N° of holdings | 43 | 99 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 10, 2024 | June 20, 2017 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
RSMC
USA
96.8%
Other
3.2%
FSGS
USA
93.61%
Other
6.39%
Sectors
RSMC
Industrials
27.97%
Information Techn.
19.92%
Financials
16.53%
Consumer Discreti.
8.87%
Other
26.71%
FSGS
Industrials
21.23%
Information Techn.
18.79%
Financials
17.87%
Health Care
16.19%
Consumer Discreti.
13.18%
Other
12.74%
Advertisement
Diversification
RSMC
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
47.43%
FSGS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
19.8%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of March 31, 2026
RSMC
FIRSTCASH HOLDINGS INC
4.90%
STONEX GROUP INC
4.48%
HNN ARMSTRNG S/D
3.92%
BJS WHOLESALE CLUB HOLDINGS INC
3.91%
BADGER METER
3.54%
RADNET
3.28%
ESCO TECHNOLOGIES
2.90%
US9037311076
2.88%
STRIDE INC
2.70%
INTERDIGITAL
2.65%
CASELLA WASTE
2.61%
TD SYNNEX
2.58%
NORDSON
2.38%
OLLIE'S BARGAI/D
2.36%
RBC BEARINGS
2.34%
FSGS
CLEAR SECURE
1.49%
MICHAEL STORES
1.49%
COCA COLA CONSOLIDATED
1.45%
STRIDE INC
1.38%
COMFORT SYSTEMS USA
1.37%
LEMAITRE VASCULAR
1.33%
ATI INC
1.31%
STERLING INFRASTRUCTURE INC
1.30%
NEW YORK TIMES
1.29%
CORCEPT THERAPEUTICS
1.28%
LANTHEUS HOLDINGS
1.26%
WOODWARD
1.23%
TRADEWEB MARKETS
1.21%
WEATHERFORD INTL PLC
1.21%
ENSIGN GROUP
1.20%
Frequently asked questions about RSMC and FSGS
How have the RSMC and FSGS ETFs performed in 2026?
As of April 28, 2026, RSMC is up 7.22% year-to-date (YTD), while FSGS has returned 1.65%. That puts RSMC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: RSMC or FSGS?
Year-to-date, the RSMC ETF saw -$13M in flows, compared to +$2M for FSGS.
Which ETF is more volatile: RSMC or FSGS?
Over the past year, RSMC had a volatility of 17.01%, while FSGS experienced 15.63%.
Which ETF is bigger: RSMC or FSGS?
As of April 28, 2026, RSMC holds $744.73 M in assets under management (AUM), while FSGS manages $29.38 M.
What sectors do the RSMC and FSGS ETFs invest in?
RSMC leans toward sectors like Industrials, Information Technology and Financials. Meanwhile, FSGS focuses on Industrials, Information Technology and Financials.
What are the top holdings of the RSMC ETF and FSGS ETF?
RSMC top holdings include FIRSTCASH HOLDINGS INC, STONEX GROUP INC and HNN ARMSTRNG S/D. FSGS holds in its top three: CLEAR SECURE, MICHAEL STORES and COCA COLA CONSOLIDATED.
Which ETF is more diversified: RSMC or FSGS?
RSMC holds 44 securities with 47.43% of its assets in the top 15. FSGS has 99 securities and a top 15 weight of 19.8%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
