Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
RPGvsQGROETF Comparison
Invesco S&P 500® Pure Growth ETF (RPG) belongs to the US Large Cap Growth segment. American Century U.S. Quality Growth ETF (QGRO) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. RPG's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Industrials. In contrast, QGRO's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Health Care and Communication Services. RPG is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 0.29% for QGRO. RPG is up 1.14% year-to-date (YTD) with +$2M in YTD flows. QGRO performs worse with -6.52% YTD performance, and -$58M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of RPG and QGRO below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
RPG vs QGRO performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | RPG QGRO | -6.01%-2.83% | -1.18%-6.12% | +1.14%-6.52% | +20.59%+13.83% | +65.39%+76.11% | +49.14%+76.26% |
| Flows | RPG QGRO | +$34M-$22M | +$2M-$46M | +$2M-$58M | -$194M+$754M | -$1.17B+$1.28B | -$1.56B+$1.37B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | RPG QGRO | +21.33%+16.90% | +24.91%+21.34% | +20.70%+17.94% | +23.16%+21.17% |
| Max drawdown | RPG QGRO | -6.04%-9.33% | -16.06%-15.12% | -24.81%-23.75% | -35.61%-31.85% |
| Max drawdown duration | RPG QGRO | 22d70d | 37d37d | 127d156d | 1100d794d |
RPG | QGRO | |
Last sale 3/20/2026 at 1:30 PM | $47.23 | $105.26 |
| Previous close 03/19/2026 | $48.60 | $106.94 |
| Consolidated volume 03/19/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
RPG | QGRO | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
RPG | QGRO | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $47.23 | $105.26 |
| 1D performance | -2.82% | -1.57% |
| AuM | $1.59 B | $2.04 B |
| E/R | 0.35% | 0.29% |
RPG | QGRO | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Invesco | American Century Investments |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 Pure Growth Index | American Century U.S. Quality Growth Index |
| N° of holdings | 55 | 179 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 1, 2006 | January 11, 2018 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the RPG and QGRO ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 20, 2026, RPG is up 1.14% year-to-date (YTD), while QGRO has lost -6.52%. That puts RPG better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: RPG or QGRO?
Year-to-date, the RPG ETF saw +$2M in flows, compared to -$58M for QGRO.
Which ETF is more volatile: RPG or QGRO?
Over the past year, RPG had a volatility of 24.91%, while QGRO experienced 21.34%.
Which ETF is bigger: RPG or QGRO?
As of March 20, 2026, RPG holds $1.59 B in assets under management (AUM), while QGRO manages $2.04 B.
What sectors do the RPG and QGRO ETFs invest in?
RPG leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Industrials. Meanwhile, QGRO focuses on Information Technology, Health Care and Communication Services.
What are the top holdings of the RPG ETF and QGRO ETF?
RPG top holdings include US80004C2008, COMFORT SYSTEMS USA and BERKSHIRE HATHWAY. QGRO holds in its top three: ALPHABET INC-CL, US5128073062 and AMPHENOL.
Which ETF is more diversified: RPG or QGRO?
RPG holds 60 securities with 36.86% of its assets in the top 15. QGRO has 190 securities and a top 15 weight of 40.73%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
