RPGvsGFLWETF Comparison
VS
Invesco S&P 500® Pure Growth ETF (RPG) and VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF (GFLW) belong to the same industry segment: US Large Cap Growth. RPG's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Industrials and Consumer Services. In contrast, GFLW's top sector exposures are Technology, Industrials and Healthcare. RPG is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 0.5% for GFLW. RPG is up 22.59% year-to-date (YTD) with -$7M in YTD flows. GFLW performs worse with 20.61% YTD performance, and +$279M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of RPG and GFLW below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
RPG vs GFLW performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 08/31/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | RPG GFLW | +2.18%+6.29% | -5.71%+3.47% | +22.59%+20.61% | +22.95%+25.58% | +84.85%n/a | +44.59%n/a |
| Flows | RPG GFLW | -$124M+$113M | -$104M+$220M | -$7M+$279M | -$151M+$360M | -$951M- | -$1.57B- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | RPG GFLW | +34.88%+25.15% | +25.41%+21.85% | +23.49%n/a | +24.57%n/a |
| Max drawdown | RPG GFLW | -16.96%-9.33% | -16.96%-14.90% | -24.81%n/a | -35.61%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | RPG GFLW | 62d42d | 62d172d | 127dn/a | 1100dn/a |
Trading data
RPG | GFLW | |
Last sale 9/1/2026 at 1:30 PM | $56.24 | $33.33 |
| Previous close 08/31/2026 | $57.19 | $34.01 |
| Consolidated volume 08/31/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
RPG | GFLW | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/1/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
RPG | GFLW | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $56.24 | $33.33 |
| 1D performance | -1.66% | -2.01% |
| AuM | $1.92 B | $1.06 B |
| E/R | 0.35% | 0.5% |
Characteristics
RPG | GFLW | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Invesco | VictoryShares |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 Pure Growth Index | Victory Free Cash Flow Growth Index |
| N° of holdings | 65 | 100 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 1, 2006 | December 4, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
RPG
USA
98.49%
Other
1.51%
GFLW
USA
96.35%
Other
3.65%
Sectors
RPG
Technology
41.26%
Industrials
17.99%
Consumer Services
11.78%
Healthcare
7.81%
Finance
7.1%
Other
14.06%
GFLW
Technology
43.92%
Industrials
16.36%
Healthcare
15.56%
Consumer Services
11.49%
Other
12.67%
Advertisement
Diversification
RPG
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
37.91%
GFLW
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
34.34%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
RPG
Sandisk Corp.
5.60%
Micron Technology, Inc.
3.24%
Comfort Systems USA, Inc.
3.10%
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.
2.49%
Howmet Aerospace, Inc.
2.40%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
2.36%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
2.36%
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
2.25%
Interactive Brokers Group, Inc.
2.12%
Amphenol Corp.
2.10%
KLA Corp.
2.09%
Incyte Corp.
2.03%
Eli Lilly & Co.
2.00%
Ciena Corp.
1.89%
Datadog, Inc.
1.87%
GFLW
NVIDIA Corp.
3.76%
Caterpillar, Inc.
3.13%
Dell Technologies, Inc.
2.82%
Sandisk Corp.
2.46%
Broadcom Inc.
2.45%
Applied Materials, Inc.
2.37%
Eli Lilly & Co.
2.33%
Lam Research Corp.
2.26%
GE Vernova, Inc.
2.19%
Royalty Pharma Plc
2.10%
Newmont Corp.
2.01%
Comfort Systems USA, Inc.
1.77%
Adobe, Inc.
1.58%
KLA Corp.
1.58%
Booking Holdings, Inc.
1.53%
Frequently asked questions about RPG and GFLW
How have the RPG and GFLW ETFs performed in 2026?
As of August 31, 2026, RPG is up 22.59% year-to-date (YTD), while GFLW has returned 20.61%. That puts RPG better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: RPG or GFLW?
Year-to-date, the RPG ETF saw -$7M in flows, compared to +$279M for GFLW.
Which ETF is more volatile: RPG or GFLW?
Over the past year, RPG had a volatility of 25.41%, while GFLW experienced 21.85%.
Which ETF is bigger: RPG or GFLW?
As of August 31, 2026, RPG holds $1.92 B in assets under management (AUM), while GFLW manages $1.06 B.
What sectors do the RPG and GFLW ETFs invest in?
RPG leans toward sectors like Technology, Industrials and Consumer Services. Meanwhile, GFLW focuses on Technology, Industrials and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the RPG ETF and GFLW ETF?
RPG top holdings include Sandisk Corp., Micron Technology, Inc. and Comfort Systems USA, Inc.. GFLW holds in its top three: NVIDIA Corp., Caterpillar, Inc. and Dell Technologies, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: RPG or GFLW?
RPG holds 66 securities with 37.91% of its assets in the top 15. GFLW has 100 securities and a top 15 weight of 34.34%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
