RPGvsFTGSETF Comparison
VS
Invesco S&P 500® Pure Growth ETF (RPG) and First Trust Growth Strength ETF (FTGS) belong to the same industry segment: US Large Cap Growth. RPG's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Industrials and Consumer Services. In contrast, FTGS's top sector exposures are Technology, Healthcare and Industrials. RPG is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 0.6% for FTGS. RPG is up 21.07% year-to-date (YTD) with +$126M in YTD flows. FTGS performs worse with 7.54% YTD performance, and -$70M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of RPG and FTGS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
RPG vs FTGS performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/17/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | RPG FTGS | -7.53%+1.71% | +4.95%+4.68% | +21.07%+7.54% | +21.48%+11.03% | +85.04%+58.67% | +59.01%n/a |
| Flows | RPG FTGS | -$13M+$42K | +$72M-$12M | +$126M-$70M | -$31M-$8M | -$844M+$1.01B | -$1.22B- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | RPG FTGS | +32.68%+12.51% | +23.82%+13.37% | +22.80%+16.56% | +24.22%n/a |
| Max drawdown | RPG FTGS | -11.64%-3.94% | -11.64%-9.44% | -24.81%-20.04% | -35.61%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | RPG FTGS | 17d32d | 17d171d | 127d112d | 1100dn/a |
Trading data
RPG | FTGS | |
Last sale 7/20/2026 at 1:30 PM | $56.65 | $37.47 |
| Previous close 07/17/2026 | $56.45 | $37.47 |
| Consolidated volume 07/17/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
RPG | FTGS | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/20/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
RPG | FTGS | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $56.65 | $37.47 |
| 1D performance | +0.35% | -0.00% |
| AuM | $2.02 B | $1.28 B |
| E/R | 0.35% | 0.6% |
Characteristics
RPG | FTGS | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Invesco | First Trust |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 Pure Growth Index | The Growth Strength Index |
| N° of holdings | 64 | 50 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 1, 2006 | October 26, 2022 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
RPG
USA
98.64%
Other
1.36%
FTGS
USA
96.38%
Other
3.62%
Sectors
RPG
Technology
45.18%
Industrials
18.73%
Consumer Services
10%
Other
26.09%
FTGS
Technology
34.07%
Healthcare
17.15%
Industrials
12.53%
Finance
11.55%
Consumer Cyclical.
7.36%
Other
17.34%
Advertisement
Diversification
RPG
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
41.29%
FTGS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
36.68%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of May 31, 2026
RPG
Sandisk Corp.
8.13%
Micron Technology, Inc.
3.64%
Comfort Systems USA, Inc.
3.40%
Ciena Corp.
2.93%
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
2.64%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
2.56%
KLA Corp.
2.13%
Vertiv Holdings Co.
2.12%
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.
2.09%
Howmet Aerospace, Inc.
2.06%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.99%
EchoStar Corp.
1.97%
Lam Research Corp.
1.90%
Quanta Services, Inc.
1.90%
Amphenol Corp.
1.85%
FTGS
Fortinet, Inc.
3.49%
Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
3.48%
ServiceNow, Inc.
2.73%
Cadence Design Systems, Inc.
2.59%
Applovin Corp.
2.50%
Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc.
2.35%
Eli Lilly & Co.
2.27%
DexCom, Inc.
2.27%
Monster Beverage Corp.
2.25%
Broadcom Inc.
2.20%
NVIDIA Corp.
2.16%
Palantir Technologies, Inc.
2.13%
Microsoft Corp.
2.11%
Interactive Brokers Group, Inc.
2.11%
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
2.04%
Frequently asked questions about RPG and FTGS
How have the RPG and FTGS ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 17, 2026, RPG is up 21.07% year-to-date (YTD), while FTGS has returned 7.54%. That puts RPG better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: RPG or FTGS?
Year-to-date, the RPG ETF saw +$126M in flows, compared to -$70M for FTGS.
Which ETF is more volatile: RPG or FTGS?
Over the past year, RPG had a volatility of 23.82%, while FTGS experienced 13.37%.
Which ETF is bigger: RPG or FTGS?
As of July 17, 2026, RPG holds $2.02 B in assets under management (AUM), while FTGS manages $1.28 B.
What sectors do the RPG and FTGS ETFs invest in?
RPG leans toward sectors like Technology, Industrials and Consumer Services. Meanwhile, FTGS focuses on Technology, Healthcare and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the RPG ETF and FTGS ETF?
RPG top holdings include Sandisk Corp., Micron Technology, Inc. and Comfort Systems USA, Inc.. FTGS holds in its top three: Fortinet, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and ServiceNow, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: RPG or FTGS?
RPG holds 65 securities with 41.29% of its assets in the top 15. FTGS has 50 securities and a top 15 weight of 36.68%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
