RPGvsCAMLETF Comparison
VS
Invesco S&P 500® Pure Growth ETF (RPG) and Congress Large Cap Growth ETF (CAML) belong to the same industry segment: US Large Cap Growth. RPG's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Industrials and Consumer Services. In contrast, CAML's top sector exposures are Technology, Industrials and Finance. RPG is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 0.65% for CAML. RPG is up 21.07% year-to-date (YTD) with +$126M in YTD flows. CAML performs worse with 2.76% YTD performance, and +$22M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of RPG and CAML below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
RPG vs CAML performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/17/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | RPG CAML | -7.53%-1.60% | +4.95%+1.01% | +21.07%+2.76% | +21.48%+6.12% | +85.04%n/a | +59.01%n/a |
| Flows | RPG CAML | -$13M-$5M | +$72M-$6M | +$126M+$22M | -$31M+$40M | -$844M- | -$1.22B- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | RPG CAML | +32.68%+16.28% | +23.82%+15.37% | +22.80%n/a | +24.22%n/a |
| Max drawdown | RPG CAML | -11.64%-5.52% | -11.64%-14.94% | -24.81%n/a | -35.61%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | RPG CAML | 17d45d | 17d210d | 127dn/a | 1100dn/a |
Trading data
RPG | CAML | |
Last sale 7/17/2026 at 1:30 PM | $56.45 | $39.29 |
| Previous close 07/16/2026 | $57.20 | $39.79 |
| Consolidated volume 07/16/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
CAML
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexRPG | CAML | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/17/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
RPG | CAML | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $56.45 | $39.29 |
| 1D performance | -1.31% | -1.26% |
| AuM | $2.02 B | $372.06 M |
| E/R | 0.35% | 0.65% |
Characteristics
RPG | CAML | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | Invesco | Congress Asset Management |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 Pure Growth Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 64 | 37 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 1, 2006 | August 22, 2023 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
RPG
USA
98.64%
Other
1.36%
CAML
USA
89.61%
Other
10.39%
Sectors
RPG
Technology
45.18%
Industrials
18.73%
Consumer Services
10%
Other
26.09%
CAML
Technology
46.56%
Industrials
13.77%
Finance
10.94%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
8.56%
Other
20.17%
Advertisement
Diversification
RPG
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
41.29%
CAML
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
57.99%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of May 31, 2026
RPG
Sandisk Corp.
8.13%
Micron Technology, Inc.
3.64%
Comfort Systems USA, Inc.
3.40%
Ciena Corp.
2.93%
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
2.64%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
2.56%
KLA Corp.
2.13%
Vertiv Holdings Co.
2.12%
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.
2.09%
Howmet Aerospace, Inc.
2.06%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.99%
EchoStar Corp.
1.97%
Lam Research Corp.
1.90%
Quanta Services, Inc.
1.90%
Amphenol Corp.
1.85%
CAML
NVIDIA Corp.
8.01%
Apple, Inc.
6.00%
Microsoft Corp.
4.99%
Alphabet, Inc.
4.94%
Broadcom Inc.
4.60%
GE Vernova, Inc.
3.79%
Howmet Aerospace, Inc.
3.36%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.13%
Eaton Corp. Plc
3.09%
The TJX Cos., Inc.
2.96%
Amphenol Corp.
2.72%
Arista Networks, Inc.
2.69%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
2.67%
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
2.52%
Welltower, Inc.
2.52%
Frequently asked questions about RPG and CAML
How have the RPG and CAML ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 17, 2026, RPG is up 21.07% year-to-date (YTD), while CAML has returned 2.76%. That puts RPG better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: RPG or CAML?
Year-to-date, the RPG ETF saw +$126M in flows, compared to +$22M for CAML.
Which ETF is more volatile: RPG or CAML?
Over the past year, RPG had a volatility of 23.82%, while CAML experienced 15.37%.
Which ETF is bigger: RPG or CAML?
As of July 17, 2026, RPG holds $2.02 B in assets under management (AUM), while CAML manages $372.06 M.
What sectors do the RPG and CAML ETFs invest in?
RPG leans toward sectors like Technology, Industrials and Consumer Services. Meanwhile, CAML focuses on Technology, Industrials and Finance.
What are the top holdings of the RPG ETF and CAML ETF?
RPG top holdings include Sandisk Corp., Micron Technology, Inc. and Comfort Systems USA, Inc.. CAML holds in its top three: NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc. and Microsoft Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: RPG or CAML?
RPG holds 65 securities with 41.29% of its assets in the top 15. CAML has 37 securities and a top 15 weight of 57.99%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
