RODMvsFNDFETF Comparison
ETF 1
RODM
Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF
This fund is part of
DM Large & Mid Cap
-0.57%
VS
ETF 2
FNDF
Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF
This fund is part of
DM Large & Mid Cap
-0.57%
Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM) and Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF) belong to the same industry segment: DM Large & Mid Cap. RODM's top 3 sector exposures are Finance, Industrials and Healthcare. In contrast, FNDF's top sector exposures are Finance, Energy and Industrials. RODM is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.29%, versus 0.25% for FNDF. RODM is up 15.17% year-to-date (YTD) with +$163M in YTD flows. FNDF performs better with 23.63% YTD performance, and +$1.99B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of RODM and FNDF below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
RODM vs FNDF performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/01/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | RODM FNDF | +0.84%+2.81% | +4.10%+2.69% | +15.17%+23.63% | +23.61%+38.43% | +78.03%+90.49% | +61.46%+98.18% |
| Flows | RODM FNDF | +$6M+$413M | +$69M+$1.06B | +$163M+$1.99B | +$181M+$2.93B | -$477M+$5.65B | -$647M+$9.54B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | RODM FNDF | +7.03%+13.11% | +8.92%+14.05% | +10.83%+14.01% | +12.30%+14.72% |
| Max drawdown | RODM FNDF | -2.15%-4.43% | -7.11%-10.49% | -10.21%-13.78% | -28.60%-25.58% |
| Max drawdown duration | RODM FNDF | 28d62d | 65d65d | 34d44d | 981d545d |
Trading data
RODM | FNDF | |
Last sale 9/2/2026 at 1:30 PM | $42.14 | $55.55 |
| Previous close 09/01/2026 | $41.87 | $55.27 |
| Consolidated volume 09/01/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
RODM | FNDF | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/2/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
RODM | FNDF | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $42.14 | $55.55 |
| 1D performance | +0.66% | +0.51% |
| AuM | $1.65 B | $26.21 B |
| E/R | 0.29% | 0.25% |
Characteristics
RODM | FNDF | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Hartford Funds | Schwab ETFs |
| Benchmark | Hartford Risk-Optimized Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) Index | RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity Developed ex US Large Index |
| N° of holdings | 336 | 856 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | February 25, 2015 | August 15, 2013 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
RODM
Japan
19.59%
Canada
18.25%
Australia
8.91%
United Kingdom
7.87%
Other
45.38%
FNDF
Japan
22.89%
United Kingdom
13.76%
Canada
8.95%
Republic of Korea
8.38%
France
8.23%
Germany
7.85%
Other
29.94%
Sectors
RODM
Finance
31.42%
Industrials
12.86%
Healthcare
10.25%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
8.72%
Technology
7.56%
Other
29.19%
FNDF
Finance
20.42%
Energy
12.31%
Industrials
11.31%
Technology
11.25%
Non-Energy Materi.
10.64%
Consumer Cyclical.
9.23%
Other
24.83%
Advertisement
Diversification
RODM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
15.56%
FNDF
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
18.53%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
RODM
Equinor ASA
1.25%
Royal Bank of Canada
1.19%
Bank of Montreal
1.16%
ASML Holding NV
1.15%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
1.11%
BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd.
1.08%
Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp. Ltd.
1.08%
Millicom International Cellular SA
1.01%
Great-West Lifeco, Inc.
1.00%
A.P. Møller-Mærsk A/S
0.99%
The Bank of Nova Scotia
0.96%
Roche Holding AG
0.94%
Otsuka Holdings Co., Ltd.
0.90%
Novartis AG
0.88%
Woolworths Group Ltd.
0.86%
FNDF
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
3.66%
Shell Plc
2.44%
TotalEnergies SE
1.71%
HSBC Holdings Plc
1.18%
BHP Group Ltd.
1.15%
BP Plc
1.12%
Glencore Plc
1.01%
Roche Holding AG
0.93%
Toyota Motor Corp.
0.91%
Banco Santander SA
0.84%
SK hynix, Inc.
0.78%
Nestlé SA
0.76%
Deutsche Telekom AG
0.70%
Rio Tinto Plc
0.68%
Novartis AG
0.67%
Frequently asked questions about RODM and FNDF
How have the RODM and FNDF ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 1, 2026, RODM is up 15.17% year-to-date (YTD), while FNDF has returned 23.63%. That puts FNDF better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: RODM or FNDF?
Year-to-date, the RODM ETF saw +$163M in flows, compared to +$1.99B for FNDF.
Which ETF is more volatile: RODM or FNDF?
Over the past year, RODM had a volatility of 8.92%, while FNDF experienced 14.05%.
Which ETF is bigger: RODM or FNDF?
As of September 1, 2026, RODM holds $1.65 B in assets under management (AUM), while FNDF manages $26.21 B.
What sectors do the RODM and FNDF ETFs invest in?
RODM leans toward sectors like Finance, Industrials and Healthcare. Meanwhile, FNDF focuses on Finance, Energy and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the RODM ETF and FNDF ETF?
RODM top holdings include Equinor ASA, Royal Bank of Canada and Bank of Montreal. FNDF holds in its top three: Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Shell Plc and TotalEnergies SE.
Which ETF is more diversified: RODM or FNDF?
RODM holds 336 securities with 15.56% of its assets in the top 15. FNDF has 876 securities and a top 15 weight of 18.53%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
