New

Turn ETF ideas into real portfolios. Try the builder now →

Advertisement
Advertisement

RODMvsEFVETF Comparison

ETF 1
RODM

Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF

This fund is part of
DM Large & Mid Cap
-0.57%
VS
ETF 2
EFV

iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF

This fund is part of
DM Large & Mid Cap
-0.57%

Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM) and iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF (EFV) belong to the same industry segment: DM Large & Mid Cap. RODM's top 3 sector exposures are Finance, Industrials and Healthcare. In contrast, EFV's top sector exposures are Finance, Consumer Non-Cyclicals and Non-Energy Materials. RODM is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.29%, versus 0.31% for EFV. RODM is up 15.17% year-to-date (YTD) with +$163M in YTD flows. EFV performs better with 17.32% YTD performance, and +$213M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of RODM and EFV below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.

Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios.  Discover our library of Model portfolios

RODM vs EFV performance and flow charts

Performance

0.00.51.01.5%Aug 3Aug 10Aug 17Aug 24Aug 31

Cumulative Flows

0 B0.5 B1 B1.5 B2 BAug 3Aug 10Aug 17Aug 24Aug 31

Get all the metrics on this page, and more, through a reliable ETF data feed

Daily, global ETF data for advanced analysis or integration into apps (API), from our partner Trackinsight.

Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/01/2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y5Y
Perf.
RODM
EFV
+0.84%+0.66%
+4.10%+6.75%
+15.17%+17.32%
+23.61%+29.17%
+78.03%+89.02%
+61.46%+95.18%
Flows
RODM
EFV
+$6M+$2.28B
+$69M+$612M
+$163M+$213M
+$181M-$1.62B
-$477M+$2.75B
-$647M+$5.55B
Volatility and drawdown
3M1Y3Y5Y
Volatility
RODM
EFV
+7.03%+11.76%
+8.92%+13.65%
+10.83%+13.88%
+12.30%+15.37%
Max drawdown
RODM
EFV
-2.15%-2.54%
-7.11%-10.69%
-10.21%-13.36%
-28.60%-25.83%
Max drawdown duration
RODM
EFV
28d9d
65d123d
34d37d
981d518d
Trading data

Create an account to view trading data

Join for free
RODM
EFV
Last sale
9/2/2026 at 1:30 PM
$42.14
$82.07
Previous close
09/01/2026
$41.87
$81.60
Consolidated volume
09/01/2026
Average volume
30 days
Average discount or premium
30 days
Average Bid/Ask spread
30 days
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference

Create an account to view replication metrics

Join for free

Create an account to view replication quality

Join for free
RODM
EFV
Tracking error
Tracking difference
1 year cumulative return difference
Best
Worst
Daily return difference
Average
Worst
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/2/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
RODM
EFV
Last price
$42.14
$82.07
1D performance
+0.66%
+0.58%
AuM$1.65 B$31.69 B
E/R0.29%0.31%
Characteristics
RODM
EFV
Management strategyPassivePassive
ProviderHartford FundsiShares
BenchmarkHartford Risk-Optimized Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) IndexMSCI EAFE Value Index
N° of holdings336399
Asset classEquitiesEquities
Trailing 12m distribution yield
Join
Join
Inception dateFebruary 25, 2015August 1, 2005
ESGNoNo
Advertisement
Exposure

Countries

RODM
Japan
19.59%
Canada
18.25%
Australia
8.91%
United Kingdom
7.87%
Other
45.38%
EFV
Japan
23.34%
United Kingdom
16.45%
France
9.98%
Switzerland
9.57%
Germany
8.78%
Other
31.88%

Sectors

RODM
Finance
31.42%
Industrials
12.86%
Healthcare
10.25%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
8.72%
Technology
7.56%
Other
29.19%
EFV
Finance
42.75%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
9.89%
Non-Energy Materi.
7.63%
Healthcare
7.34%
Energy
7%
Other
25.39%
Advertisement

Diversification

RODM

Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15

15.56%
EFV

Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15

26.16%

Top 15 holdings

Data as of July 31, 2026
RODM
Equinor ASA
1.25%
Royal Bank of Canada
1.19%
Bank of Montreal
1.16%
ASML Holding NV
1.15%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
1.11%
BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd.
1.08%
Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp. Ltd.
1.08%
Millicom International Cellular SA
1.01%
Great-West Lifeco, Inc.
1.00%
A.P. Møller-Mærsk A/S
0.99%
The Bank of Nova Scotia
0.96%
Roche Holding AG
0.94%
Otsuka Holdings Co., Ltd.
0.90%
Novartis AG
0.88%
Woolworths Group Ltd.
0.86%
EFV
HSBC Holdings Plc
3.24%
Nestlé SA
2.34%
Shell Plc
2.23%
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.
2.11%
Roche Holding AG
1.78%
Allianz SE
1.68%
Novartis AG
1.67%
Toyota Motor Corp.
1.67%
TotalEnergies SE
1.53%
Siemens AG
1.39%
Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria SA
1.39%
Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc.
1.36%
Iberdrola SA
1.30%
Unilever Plc
1.27%
BHP Group Ltd.
1.22%
Frequently asked questions about RODM and EFV

How have the RODM and EFV ETFs performed in 2026?

As of September 1, 2026, RODM is up 15.17% year-to-date (YTD), while EFV has returned 17.32%. That puts EFV better performer ahead so far this year.

Which ETF is attracting more investor money: RODM or EFV?

Year-to-date, the RODM ETF saw +$163M in flows, compared to +$213M for EFV.

Which ETF is more volatile: RODM or EFV?

Over the past year, RODM had a volatility of 8.92%, while EFV experienced 13.65%.

Which ETF is bigger: RODM or EFV?

As of September 1, 2026, RODM holds $1.65 B in assets under management (AUM), while EFV manages $31.69 B.

What sectors do the RODM and EFV ETFs invest in?

RODM leans toward sectors like Finance, Industrials and Healthcare. Meanwhile, EFV focuses on Finance, Consumer Non-Cyclicals and Non-Energy Materials.

What are the top holdings of the RODM ETF and EFV ETF?

RODM top holdings include Equinor ASA, Royal Bank of Canada and Bank of Montreal. EFV holds in its top three: HSBC Holdings Plc, Nestlé SA and Shell Plc.

Which ETF is more diversified: RODM or EFV?

RODM holds 336 securities with 15.56% of its assets in the top 15. EFV has 405 securities and a top 15 weight of 26.16%.

Advertisement
Advertisement
The Active Trader Report

Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up

Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.

Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up