RODMvsEFGETF Comparison
ETF 1
RODM
Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF
This fund is part of
DM Large & Mid Cap
-0.57%
VS
Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM) and iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF (EFG) belong to the same industry segment: DM Large & Mid Cap. RODM's top 3 sector exposures are Finance, Industrials and Healthcare. In contrast, EFG's top sector exposures are Industrials, Technology and Finance. RODM is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.29%, versus 0.34% for EFG. RODM is up 15.17% year-to-date (YTD) with +$163M in YTD flows. EFG performs worse with 8.33% YTD performance, and +$6.28B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of RODM and EFG below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
RODM vs EFG performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/01/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | RODM EFG | +0.84%+0.16% | +4.10%+0.13% | +15.17%+8.33% | +23.61%+14.45% | +78.03%+41.07% | +61.46%+18.59% |
| Flows | RODM EFG | +$6M- | +$69M+$936M | +$163M+$6.28B | +$181M+$2.17B | -$477M+$1.03B | -$647M+$2.88B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | RODM EFG | +7.03%+19.55% | +8.92%+18.93% | +10.83%+17.16% | +12.30%+18.34% |
| Max drawdown | RODM EFG | -2.15%-5.26% | -7.11%-12.79% | -10.21%-16.80% | -28.60%-35.55% |
| Max drawdown duration | RODM EFG | 28d45d | 65d92d | 34d232d | 981d1114d |
Trading data
RODM | EFG | |
Last sale 9/2/2026 at 1:30 PM | $42.14 | $122.86 |
| Previous close 09/01/2026 | $41.87 | $122.34 |
| Consolidated volume 09/01/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
RODM | EFG | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/2/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
RODM | EFG | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $42.14 | $122.86 |
| 1D performance | +0.66% | +0.43% |
| AuM | $1.65 B | $16.74 B |
| E/R | 0.29% | 0.34% |
Characteristics
RODM | EFG | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Hartford Funds | iShares |
| Benchmark | Hartford Risk-Optimized Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) Index | MSCI EAFE Growth Index |
| N° of holdings | 336 | 351 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | February 25, 2015 | August 1, 2005 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
RODM
Japan
19.59%
Canada
18.25%
Australia
8.91%
United Kingdom
7.87%
Other
45.38%
EFG
Japan
22.47%
United Kingdom
11.35%
Switzerland
10.62%
Netherlands
10.24%
Germany
8.86%
France
7.81%
Other
28.65%
Sectors
RODM
Finance
31.42%
Industrials
12.86%
Healthcare
10.25%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
8.72%
Technology
7.56%
Other
29.19%
EFG
Industrials
25.29%
Technology
21.5%
Finance
12.77%
Healthcare
12.75%
Other
27.69%
Advertisement
Diversification
RODM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
15.56%
EFG
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
27.51%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
RODM
Equinor ASA
1.25%
Royal Bank of Canada
1.19%
Bank of Montreal
1.16%
ASML Holding NV
1.15%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
1.11%
BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd.
1.08%
Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp. Ltd.
1.08%
Millicom International Cellular SA
1.01%
Great-West Lifeco, Inc.
1.00%
A.P. Møller-Mærsk A/S
0.99%
The Bank of Nova Scotia
0.96%
Roche Holding AG
0.94%
Otsuka Holdings Co., Ltd.
0.90%
Novartis AG
0.88%
Woolworths Group Ltd.
0.86%
EFG
ASML Holding NV
5.97%
AstraZeneca PLC
2.40%
Commonwealth Bank of Australia
1.94%
SAP SE
1.74%
Schneider Electric SE
1.67%
UBS Group AG
1.56%
Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc
1.53%
Novo Nordisk A/S
1.52%
ABB Ltd.
1.42%
Tokyo Electron Ltd.
1.36%
Hitachi Ltd.
1.35%
Sony Group Corp.
1.30%
Airbus SE
1.29%
Safran SA
1.25%
Siemens Energy AG
1.21%
Frequently asked questions about RODM and EFG
How have the RODM and EFG ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 1, 2026, RODM is up 15.17% year-to-date (YTD), while EFG has returned 8.33%. That puts RODM better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: RODM or EFG?
Year-to-date, the RODM ETF saw +$163M in flows, compared to +$6.28B for EFG.
Which ETF is more volatile: RODM or EFG?
Over the past year, RODM had a volatility of 8.92%, while EFG experienced 18.93%.
Which ETF is bigger: RODM or EFG?
As of September 1, 2026, RODM holds $1.65 B in assets under management (AUM), while EFG manages $16.74 B.
What sectors do the RODM and EFG ETFs invest in?
RODM leans toward sectors like Finance, Industrials and Healthcare. Meanwhile, EFG focuses on Industrials, Technology and Finance.
What are the top holdings of the RODM ETF and EFG ETF?
RODM top holdings include Equinor ASA, Royal Bank of Canada and Bank of Montreal. EFG holds in its top three: ASML Holding NV, AstraZeneca PLC and Commonwealth Bank of Australia.
Which ETF is more diversified: RODM or EFG?
RODM holds 336 securities with 15.56% of its assets in the top 15. EFG has 359 securities and a top 15 weight of 27.51%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
