ROAMvsEWYETF Comparison
VS
Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF (ROAM) and iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY) belong to the same industry segment: EM Large & Mid Cap. ROAM's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Industrials. In contrast, EWY's top sector exposures are Technology, Industrials and Finance. ROAM is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.44%, versus 0.59% for EWY. ROAM is up 21.83% year-to-date (YTD) with +$28M in YTD flows. EWY performs better with 53.08% YTD performance, and +$7.76B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of ROAM and EWY below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
ROAM vs EWY performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ROAM EWY | -2.22%-14.97% | +0.98%-8.46% | +21.83%+53.08% | +26.83%+76.27% | +86.89%+174.60% | +74.65%+108.93% |
| Flows | ROAM EWY | -$2M-$1.12B | -$4M+$2.49B | +$28M+$7.76B | +$45M+$8.92B | +$60M+$9.88B | +$45M+$9.19B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | ROAM EWY | +16.34%+51.78% | +18.30%+53.59% | +14.85%+36.52% | +14.26%+31.50% |
| Max drawdown | ROAM EWY | -5.70%-21.55% | -11.11%-35.20% | -14.82%-35.20% | -25.28%-40.82% |
| Max drawdown duration | ROAM EWY | 37d11d | 137d117d | 226d117d | 713d1414d |
Trading data
ROAM | EWY | |
Last sale 10/19/2026 at 1:30 PM | $34.79 | $156.58 |
| Previous close 10/16/2026 | $34.74 | $150.44 |
| Consolidated volume 10/16/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
ROAM | EWY | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/19/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
ROAM | EWY | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $34.79 | $156.58 |
| 1D performance | +0.13% | +4.08% |
| AuM | $105.19 M | $21.64 B |
| E/R | 0.44% | 0.59% |
Characteristics
ROAM | EWY | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Hartford Funds | iShares |
| Benchmark | Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets Equity Index | MSCI Korea 25/50 Index |
| N° of holdings | 321 | 75 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | February 25, 2015 | May 9, 2000 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
ROAM
Taiwan
23.72%
China
16.26%
Republic of Korea
12.94%
India
12.06%
Other
35.02%
EWY
Republic of Korea
99.49%
Other
0.51%
Sectors
ROAM
Technology
38.55%
Finance
22.84%
Other
38.61%
EWY
Technology
53.05%
Industrials
16.09%
Finance
14.57%
Other
16.29%
Advertisement
Diversification
ROAM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
19.12%
EWY
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
66.67%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
ROAM
Samsung Electro-Mechanics Co., Ltd.
2.73%
United Microelectronics Corp.
1.60%
SK hynix, Inc.
1.53%
ASPEED Technology, Inc.
1.44%
MediaTek, Inc.
1.43%
Elite Material Co., Ltd.
1.25%
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
1.16%
Samsung SDS Co., Ltd.
1.09%
ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd.
1.03%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
1.03%
MPI Corp.
1.02%
Global Unichip Corp.
1.01%
Chroma Ate, Inc.
0.96%
Industrial & Commercial Bank of China Ltd.
0.93%
Delta Electronics, Inc.
0.91%
EWY
SK hynix, Inc.
23.69%
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
22.24%
SK Square Co. Ltd.
2.86%
Samsung Electro-Mechanics Co., Ltd.
2.66%
KB Financial Group, Inc.
2.00%
Hyundai Motor Co.
1.72%
Shinhan Financial Group Co., Ltd.
1.62%
Hana Financial Group, Inc.
1.38%
HANWHA AEROSPACE Co., Ltd.
1.31%
Samsung SDI Co., Ltd.
1.29%
Doosan Enerbility Co., Ltd.
1.29%
NAVER Corp.
1.20%
Samsung C&T Corp.
1.17%
Kia Corp.
1.13%
Celltrion, Inc.
1.12%
Frequently asked questions about ROAM and EWY
How have the ROAM and EWY ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 16, 2026, ROAM is up 21.83% year-to-date (YTD), while EWY has returned 53.08%. That puts EWY better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: ROAM or EWY?
Year-to-date, the ROAM ETF saw +$28M in flows, compared to +$7.76B for EWY.
Which ETF is more volatile: ROAM or EWY?
Over the past year, ROAM had a volatility of 18.3%, while EWY experienced 53.59%.
Which ETF is bigger: ROAM or EWY?
As of October 16, 2026, ROAM holds $105.19 M in assets under management (AUM), while EWY manages $21.64 B.
What sectors do the ROAM and EWY ETFs invest in?
ROAM leans toward sectors like Technology and Finance. Meanwhile, EWY focuses on Technology, Industrials and Finance.
What are the top holdings of the ROAM ETF and EWY ETF?
ROAM top holdings include Samsung Electro-Mechanics Co., Ltd., United Microelectronics Corp. and SK hynix, Inc.. EWY holds in its top three: SK hynix, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and SK Square Co. Ltd..
Which ETF is more diversified: ROAM or EWY?
ROAM holds 321 securities with 19.12% of its assets in the top 15. EWY has 78 securities and a top 15 weight of 66.67%.
Advertisement
Latest news about ROAM & EWY
Surge in Asian ETFs Driven by Technology Boom
June 10, 2024
EWY
An introduction to Country-Based ETFs
July 7, 2022
EWY
Advertisement
Advertisement
