RINFvsCLSEETF Comparison
VS
ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF (RINF) and Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF (CLSE) belong to the same industry segment: Alternatives. RINF is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 1.12%, versus 1.52% for CLSE. RINF is up 3.41% year-to-date (YTD) with +$952K in YTD flows. CLSE performs better with 23.39% YTD performance, and +$659M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of RINF and CLSE below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
RINF vs CLSE performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | RINF CLSE | +0.24%-1.22% | +1.62%+0.02% | +3.41%+23.39% | +4.67%+32.16% | +7.43%+108.86% | +27.64%n/a |
| Flows | RINF CLSE | +$973K+$87M | +$650K+$266M | +$952K+$659M | -$659K+$692M | -$10M+$847M | -$21M- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | RINF CLSE | +4.65%+8.79% | +4.22%+13.01% | +6.23%+13.47% | +11.58%n/a |
| Max drawdown | RINF CLSE | -1.34%-3.12% | -2.45%-4.60% | -9.25%-15.76% | -12.70%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | RINF CLSE | 19d43d | 72d40d | 445d188d | 357dn/a |
Trading data
RINF | CLSE | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $32.54 | $33.74 |
| Previous close 10/15/2026 | $32.42 | $34.05 |
| Consolidated volume 10/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
CLSE
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexRINF | CLSE | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
RINF | CLSE | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $32.54 | $33.74 |
| 1D performance | +0.37% | -0.91% |
| AuM | $19.21 M | $1.02 B |
| E/R | 1.12% | 1.52% |
Characteristics
RINF | CLSE | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | ProShares | Convergence Investment Partners LLC |
| Benchmark | FTSE 30-Year TIPS (Treasury Rate-Hedged) Index | - |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | Bonds | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | January 10, 2012 | February 22, 2022 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
RINF
Data will be available soon
CLSE
Data will be available soon
Sectors
RINF
Data will be available soon
CLSE
Data will be available soon
Advertisement
Diversification
RINF
Data will be available soon
CLSE
Data will be available soon
Top 15 holdings
Data as of January 1, 1970
RINF
Data will be available soon
CLSE
Data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about RINF and CLSE
How have the RINF and CLSE ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 16, 2026, RINF is up 3.41% year-to-date (YTD), while CLSE has returned 23.39%. That puts CLSE better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: RINF or CLSE?
Year-to-date, the RINF ETF saw +$952K in flows, compared to +$659M for CLSE.
Which ETF is more volatile: RINF or CLSE?
Over the past year, RINF had a volatility of 4.22%, while CLSE experienced 13.01%.
Which ETF is bigger: RINF or CLSE?
As of October 16, 2026, RINF holds $19.21 M in assets under management (AUM), while CLSE manages $1.02 B.
Advertisement
Advertisement
