Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
RGLOvsIQSZETF Comparison
Invesco Global Equity Net Zero ETF
Russell Investments Global Equity Active ETF (RGLO) belongs to the Global Blended Cap segment. Invesco Global Equity Net Zero ETF (IQSZ) is part of the segment. RGLO's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. In contrast, IQSZ's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Financials and Industrials. RGLO is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.59%, versus 0.19% for IQSZ. RGLO is up 0.44% year-to-date (YTD) with +$19M in YTD flows. IQSZ performs worse with -0.48% YTD performance, and +$1M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of RGLO and IQSZ below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
RGLO vs IQSZ performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | RGLO IQSZ | -3.20%-4.16% | +0.68%+0.25% | +0.44%-0.48% | n/an/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | RGLO IQSZ | +$10M- | +$21M+$1M | +$19M+$1M | -- | -- | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | RGLO IQSZ | +10.56%+12.88% | n/an/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | RGLO IQSZ | -4.05%-6.32% | n/an/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | RGLO IQSZ | 14d16d | n/an/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
RGLO | IQSZ | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $29.16 | $27.76 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $29.37 | $27.98 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
RGLO | IQSZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $29.16 | $27.76 |
| 1D performance | -0.73% | -0.78% |
| AuM | $280.22 M | $150.44 M |
| E/R | 0.59% | 0.19% |
RGLO | IQSZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Russell Investment Management | Invesco |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 300 | 456 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | May 29, 2025 | July 16, 2025 |
| ESG | No | Yes |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the RGLO and IQSZ ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, RGLO is up 0.44% year-to-date (YTD), while IQSZ has lost -0.48%. That puts RGLO better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: RGLO or IQSZ?
Year-to-date, the RGLO ETF saw +$19M in flows, compared to +$1M for IQSZ.
Which ETF is bigger: RGLO or IQSZ?
As of March 11, 2026, RGLO holds $280.22 M in assets under management (AUM), while IQSZ manages $150.44 M.
What sectors do the RGLO and IQSZ ETFs invest in?
RGLO leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, IQSZ focuses on Information Technology, Financials and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the RGLO ETF and IQSZ ETF?
RGLO top holdings include APPLE, NVIDIA and ALPHABET INC-CL. IQSZ holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: RGLO or IQSZ?
RGLO holds 324 securities with 28.45% of its assets in the top 15. IQSZ has 481 securities and a top 15 weight of 27.82%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
