RGEFvsCRBNETF Comparison
VS
Rockefeller Global Equity ETF (RGEF) belongs to the Uncategorized Equities segment. iShares MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target ETF (CRBN) is part of the Global Blended Cap segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Technology, Finance and Industrials. RGEF is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.55%, versus 0.2% for CRBN. RGEF is up 12.3% year-to-date (YTD) with -$30M in YTD flows. CRBN performs worse with 9.17% YTD performance, and +$49M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of RGEF and CRBN below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
RGEF vs CRBN performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/17/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | RGEF CRBN | -1.19%-0.56% | +4.25%+3.17% | +12.30%+9.17% | +23.98%+19.42% | n/a+66.14% | n/a+69.03% |
| Flows | RGEF CRBN | -$4M- | -$12M+$26M | -$30M+$49M | -$49M-$65M | --$199M | --$58M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | RGEF CRBN | +15.71%+15.04% | +13.40%+13.74% | n/a+14.37% | n/a+16.02% |
| Max drawdown | RGEF CRBN | -4.74%-4.72% | -9.45%-10.24% | n/a-16.48% | n/a-26.92% |
| Max drawdown duration | RGEF CRBN | 15d45d | 47d50d | n/a87d | n/a752d |
Trading data
RGEF | CRBN | |
Last sale 7/17/2026 at 1:30 PM | $34.16 | $249.85 |
| Previous close 07/16/2026 | $34.45 | $251.97 |
| Consolidated volume 07/16/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
RGEF
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexRGEF | CRBN | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/17/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
RGEF | CRBN | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $34.16 | $249.85 |
| 1D performance | -0.82% | -0.84% |
| AuM | $807.14 M | $1.12 B |
| E/R | 0.55% | 0.2% |
Characteristics
RGEF | CRBN | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Rockefeller Asset Management | iShares |
| Benchmark | - | MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target Index |
| N° of holdings | 67 | 1070 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 25, 2024 | December 8, 2014 |
| ESG | No | Yes |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
RGEF
USA
55.83%
Japan
8.69%
United Kingdom
8.32%
Other
27.16%
CRBN
USA
62.21%
Other
37.79%
Sectors
RGEF
Technology
42.62%
Finance
16.24%
Industrials
11.89%
Other
29.25%
CRBN
Technology
38.32%
Finance
20.23%
Industrials
8.56%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
8.05%
Healthcare
7.61%
Other
17.23%
Advertisement
Diversification
RGEF
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
45.26%
CRBN
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
29.8%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of May 31, 2026
RGEF
Alphabet, Inc.
6.32%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
4.09%
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
4.09%
Microsoft Corp.
4.00%
NVIDIA Corp.
3.92%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.64%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
3.02%
Shell Plc
2.42%
Applied Materials, Inc.
2.26%
Apple, Inc.
2.18%
Murata Manufacturing Co. Ltd.
2.01%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
1.91%
GE Aerospace
1.81%
Reinsurance Group of America, Inc.
1.80%
GE Vernova, Inc.
1.79%
CRBN
NVIDIA Corp.
4.74%
Apple, Inc.
4.50%
Microsoft Corp.
3.10%
Amazon.com, Inc.
2.57%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.29%
Broadcom Inc.
1.97%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
1.84%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.58%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.35%
Tesla, Inc.
1.25%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.09%
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
0.96%
SK hynix, Inc.
0.87%
Eli Lilly & Co.
0.86%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
0.83%
Frequently asked questions about RGEF and CRBN
How have the RGEF and CRBN ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 17, 2026, RGEF is up 12.3% year-to-date (YTD), while CRBN has returned 9.17%. That puts RGEF better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: RGEF or CRBN?
Year-to-date, the RGEF ETF saw -$30M in flows, compared to +$49M for CRBN.
Which ETF is more volatile: RGEF or CRBN?
Over the past year, RGEF had a volatility of 13.4%, while CRBN experienced 13.74%.
Which ETF is bigger: RGEF or CRBN?
As of July 17, 2026, RGEF holds $807.14 M in assets under management (AUM), while CRBN manages $1.12 B.
What sectors do the RGEF and CRBN ETFs invest in?
RGEF leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Industrials. Meanwhile, CRBN focuses on Technology, Finance and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the RGEF ETF and CRBN ETF?
RGEF top holdings include Alphabet, Inc., Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. and Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.. CRBN holds in its top three: NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc. and Microsoft Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: RGEF or CRBN?
RGEF holds 67 securities with 45.26% of its assets in the top 15. CRBN has 1077 securities and a top 15 weight of 29.8%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
