Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
RFVvsXMVMETF Comparison
Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF (RFV) belongs to the US Mid Cap Value segment. Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF (XMVM) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. RFV's top 3 sector exposures are Consumer Discretionary, Financials and Industrials. In contrast, XMVM's top sector exposures are Financials, Consumer Discretionary and Utilities. RFV is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 0.41% for XMVM. RFV is down -0.89% year-to-date (YTD) with -$7M in YTD flows. XMVM performs better with 0.03% YTD performance, and +$59M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of RFV and XMVM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
RFV vs XMVM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | RFV XMVM | -8.44%-6.50% | -2.59%-1.72% | -0.89%+0.03% | +10.77%+21.96% | +47.79%+60.13% | +51.65%+56.79% |
| Flows | RFV XMVM | -$5M+$30M | -$5M-$47M | -$7M+$59M | +$17M+$108M | -$65M+$122M | +$95M+$248M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | RFV XMVM | +18.63%+14.95% | +24.15%+20.81% | +21.06%+19.12% | +22.18%+21.83% |
| Max drawdown | RFV XMVM | -11.55%-8.25% | -15.77%-13.97% | -24.37%-23.80% | -24.37%-23.80% |
| Max drawdown duration | RFV XMVM | 39d39d | 43d46d | 226d274d | 226d274d |
RFV | XMVM | |
Last sale 3/20/2026 at 1:30 PM | $124.91 | $63.54 |
| Previous close 03/19/2026 | $126.52 | $64.07 |
| Consolidated volume 03/19/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
RFV | XMVM | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
RFV | XMVM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $124.91 | $63.54 |
| 1D performance | -1.27% | -0.83% |
| AuM | $286.18 M | $406.19 M |
| E/R | 0.35% | 0.41% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the RFV and XMVM ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 19, 2026, RFV is down -0.89% year-to-date (YTD), while XMVM has returned 0.03%. That puts XMVM better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: RFV or XMVM?
Year-to-date, the RFV ETF saw -$7M in flows, compared to +$59M for XMVM.
Which ETF is more volatile: RFV or XMVM?
Over the past year, RFV had a volatility of 24.15%, while XMVM experienced 20.81%.
Which ETF is bigger: RFV or XMVM?
As of March 19, 2026, RFV holds $286.18 M in assets under management (AUM), while XMVM manages $406.19 M.
What sectors do the RFV and XMVM ETFs invest in?
RFV leans toward sectors like Consumer Discretionary, Financials and Industrials. Meanwhile, XMVM focuses on Financials, Consumer Discretionary and Utilities.
What are the top holdings of the RFV ETF and XMVM ETF?
RFV top holdings include AVNET, ARROW ELECTRONICS and PBF ENERGY INC (ORDINARY). XMVM holds in its top three: LEAR, BRIGHTHOUSE FINANCIAL and TD SYNNEX.
Which ETF is more diversified: RFV or XMVM?
RFV holds 100 securities with 29.76% of its assets in the top 15. XMVM has 78 securities and a top 15 weight of 28.22%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
