Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
RFVvsRWKETF Comparison
Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF (RFV) belongs to the US Mid Cap Value segment. Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF (RWK) is part of the US Mid Cap segment. RFV's top 3 sector exposures are Consumer Discretionary, Financials and Industrials. In contrast, RWK's top sector exposures are Industrials, Consumer Discretionary and Consumer Staples. RFV is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 0.39% for RWK. RFV is down -0.75% year-to-date (YTD) with -$7M in YTD flows. RWK performs better with -0.11% YTD performance, and +$21M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of RFV and RWK below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
RFV vs RWK performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | RFV RWK | -8.33%-7.63% | -2.04%-1.25% | -0.75%-0.11% | +11.53%+15.85% | +45.98%+50.32% | +51.54%+56.19% |
| Flows | RFV RWK | -$5M+$8M | -$5M+$26M | -$7M+$21M | +$17M+$124M | -$76M+$407M | +$99M+$478M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | RFV RWK | +18.48%+15.53% | +24.19%+21.76% | +21.14%+18.78% | +22.19%+21.20% |
| Max drawdown | RFV RWK | -11.55%-9.51% | -15.77%-15.03% | -24.37%-24.50% | -24.37%-24.50% |
| Max drawdown duration | RFV RWK | 36d36d | 43d46d | 226d274d | 226d274d |
RFV | RWK | |
Last sale 3/16/2026 at 7:59 PM | $126.71 | $128.20 |
| Previous close 03/16/2026 | $126.11 | $126.69 |
| Consolidated volume 03/16/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
RFV | RWK | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
RFV | RWK | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $126.71 | $128.20 |
| 1D performance | +0.48% | +1.19% |
| AuM | $286.57 M | $1.07 B |
| E/R | 0.35% | 0.39% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the RFV and RWK ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 16, 2026, RFV is down -0.75% year-to-date (YTD), while RWK has lost -0.11%. That puts RWK better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: RFV or RWK?
Year-to-date, the RFV ETF saw -$7M in flows, compared to +$21M for RWK.
Which ETF is more volatile: RFV or RWK?
Over the past year, RFV had a volatility of 24.19%, while RWK experienced 21.76%.
Which ETF is bigger: RFV or RWK?
As of March 16, 2026, RFV holds $286.57 M in assets under management (AUM), while RWK manages $1.07 B.
What sectors do the RFV and RWK ETFs invest in?
RFV leans toward sectors like Consumer Discretionary, Financials and Industrials. Meanwhile, RWK focuses on Industrials, Consumer Discretionary and Consumer Staples.
What are the top holdings of the RFV ETF and RWK ETF?
RFV top holdings include CONCENTRIX CORP, AVNET and ARROW ELECTRONICS. RWK holds in its top three: ALBERTSONS COMPANIES, PERFORMANCE FOOD GROUP and TD SYNNEX.
Which ETF is more diversified: RFV or RWK?
RFV holds 101 securities with 28.66% of its assets in the top 15. RWK has 398 securities and a top 15 weight of 23.28%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
