Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
RFVvsPAMCETF Comparison
Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF (RFV) belongs to the US Mid Cap Value segment. Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PAMC) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. RFV's top 3 sector exposures are Consumer Discretionary, Financials and Industrials. In contrast, PAMC's top sector exposures are Consumer Discretionary, Information Technology and Financials. RFV is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 0.6% for PAMC. RFV is down -0.75% year-to-date (YTD) with -$7M in YTD flows. PAMC performs better with 3.13% YTD performance, and -$79K in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of RFV and PAMC below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
RFV vs PAMC performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | RFV PAMC | -8.33%-5.01% | -2.04%+3.36% | -0.75%+3.13% | +11.53%+13.91% | +45.98%+54.94% | +51.54%+39.88% |
| Flows | RFV PAMC | -$5M-$12K | -$5M-$2M | -$7M-$79K | +$17M-$20M | -$76M+$6M | +$99M+$19M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | RFV PAMC | +18.48%+18.61% | +24.19%+20.35% | +21.14%+18.05% | +22.19%+20.48% |
| Max drawdown | RFV PAMC | -11.55%-7.25% | -15.77%-13.36% | -24.37%-25.78% | -24.37%-27.11% |
| Max drawdown duration | RFV PAMC | 36d22d | 43d43d | 226d422d | 226d955d |
RFV | PAMC | |
Last sale 3/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $126.71 | $47.97 |
| Previous close 03/16/2026 | $126.11 | $47.37 |
| Consolidated volume 03/16/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
RFV | PAMC | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
RFV | PAMC | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $126.71 | $47.97 |
| 1D performance | +0.48% | +1.27% |
| AuM | $286.57 M | $57.54 M |
| E/R | 0.35% | 0.6% |
RFV | PAMC | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Invesco | PACER ETFs |
| Benchmark | S&P MidCap 400 Pure Value Index | Lunt Capital U.S. MidCap Multi-Factor Rotation Index |
| N° of holdings | 97 | 134 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 1, 2006 | June 24, 2020 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the RFV and PAMC ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 16, 2026, RFV is down -0.75% year-to-date (YTD), while PAMC has returned 3.13%. That puts PAMC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: RFV or PAMC?
Year-to-date, the RFV ETF saw -$7M in flows, compared to -$79K for PAMC.
Which ETF is more volatile: RFV or PAMC?
Over the past year, RFV had a volatility of 24.19%, while PAMC experienced 20.35%.
Which ETF is bigger: RFV or PAMC?
As of March 16, 2026, RFV holds $286.57 M in assets under management (AUM), while PAMC manages $57.54 M.
What sectors do the RFV and PAMC ETFs invest in?
RFV leans toward sectors like Consumer Discretionary, Financials and Industrials. Meanwhile, PAMC focuses on Consumer Discretionary, Information Technology and Financials.
What are the top holdings of the RFV ETF and PAMC ETF?
RFV top holdings include CONCENTRIX CORP, AVNET and ARROW ELECTRONICS. PAMC holds in its top three: ALCOA CORP, ECHOSTAR and TD SYNNEX.
Which ETF is more diversified: RFV or PAMC?
RFV holds 101 securities with 28.66% of its assets in the top 15. PAMC has 139 securities and a top 15 weight of 21.18%.
Have you tried our ETF Compare tool?
Compare ETFs like a pro. Analyze fees, performance, exposure & holdings side-by-side.