Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
RFVvsMDYVETF Comparison
Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF (RFV) and SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF (MDYV) belong to the same industry segment: US Mid Cap Value. RFV's top 3 sector exposures are Consumer Discretionary, Financials and Industrials. In contrast, MDYV's top sector exposures are Financials, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary. RFV is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 0.15% for MDYV. RFV is down -0.75% year-to-date (YTD) with -$7M in YTD flows. MDYV performs better with -0.09% YTD performance, and -$53M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of RFV and MDYV below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
RFV vs MDYV performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | RFV MDYV | -8.33%-7.47% | -2.04%-0.81% | -0.75%-0.09% | +11.53%+10.11% | +45.98%+38.94% | +51.54%+38.96% |
| Flows | RFV MDYV | -$5M-$9M | -$5M-$45M | -$7M-$53M | +$17M-$231M | -$76M-$1.00B | +$99M-$4M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | RFV MDYV | +18.48%+15.12% | +24.19%+20.44% | +21.14%+18.19% | +22.19%+19.58% |
| Max drawdown | RFV MDYV | -11.55%-9.01% | -15.77%-15.15% | -24.37%-22.46% | -24.37%-22.46% |
| Max drawdown duration | RFV MDYV | 36d36d | 43d52d | 226d379d | 226d379d |
RFV | MDYV | |
Last sale 3/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $126.71 | $84.62 |
| Previous close 03/16/2026 | $126.11 | $84.19 |
| Consolidated volume 03/16/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
RFV | MDYV | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
RFV | MDYV | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $126.71 | $84.62 |
| 1D performance | +0.48% | +0.51% |
| AuM | $286.57 M | $2.39 B |
| E/R | 0.35% | 0.15% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the RFV and MDYV ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 16, 2026, RFV is down -0.75% year-to-date (YTD), while MDYV has lost -0.09%. That puts MDYV better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: RFV or MDYV?
Year-to-date, the RFV ETF saw -$7M in flows, compared to -$53M for MDYV.
Which ETF is more volatile: RFV or MDYV?
Over the past year, RFV had a volatility of 24.19%, while MDYV experienced 20.44%.
Which ETF is bigger: RFV or MDYV?
As of March 16, 2026, RFV holds $286.57 M in assets under management (AUM), while MDYV manages $2.39 B.
What sectors do the RFV and MDYV ETFs invest in?
RFV leans toward sectors like Consumer Discretionary, Financials and Industrials. Meanwhile, MDYV focuses on Financials, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the RFV ETF and MDYV ETF?
RFV top holdings include CONCENTRIX CORP, AVNET and ARROW ELECTRONICS. MDYV holds in its top three: US FOODS HOLDING CORP, RELIANCE STEEL and JONES LANG LASALLE.
Which ETF is more diversified: RFV or MDYV?
RFV holds 101 securities with 28.66% of its assets in the top 15. MDYV has 306 securities and a top 15 weight of 13.29%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
