Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
RFGvsSCDVETF Comparison
Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Growth ETF (RFG) belongs to the US Mid Cap Growth segment. Bahl & Gaynor Small Cap Dividend ETF (SCDV) is part of the US High Dividend segment. RFG's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Health Care and Information Technology. In contrast, SCDV's top sector exposures are Industrials, Health Care and Financials. RFG is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 0.7% for SCDV. RFG is up 4.39% year-to-date (YTD) with +$2M in YTD flows. SCDV performs better with 5.39% YTD performance, and +$5M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of RFG and SCDV below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
RFG vs SCDV performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | RFG SCDV | -3.92%-8.02% | +3.85%+4.71% | +4.39%+5.39% | +27.59%+19.97% | +59.30%n/a | +26.40%n/a |
| Flows | RFG SCDV | +$549K+$3M | -$936K+$7M | +$2M+$5M | -$41M+$22M | -$53M- | -$138M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | RFG SCDV | +19.62%+14.89% | +22.80%+18.61% | +19.73%n/a | +22.64%n/a |
| Max drawdown | RFG SCDV | -7.22%-8.40% | -14.87%-12.33% | -26.58%n/a | -35.14%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | RFG SCDV | 11d19d | 44d44d | 380dn/a | 836dn/a |
RFG | SCDV | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $54.75 | $25.14 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $54.97 | $25.25 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
RFG | SCDV | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
RFG | SCDV | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $54.75 | $25.14 |
| 1D performance | -0.40% | -0.46% |
| AuM | $302.68 M | $135.55 M |
| E/R | 0.35% | 0.7% |
RFG | SCDV | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | Invesco | Bahl & Gaynor |
| Benchmark | S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 87 | 33 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 1, 2006 | December 12, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the RFG and SCDV ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 13, 2026, RFG is up 4.39% year-to-date (YTD), while SCDV has returned 5.39%. That puts SCDV better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: RFG or SCDV?
Year-to-date, the RFG ETF saw +$2M in flows, compared to +$5M for SCDV.
Which ETF is more volatile: RFG or SCDV?
Over the past year, RFG had a volatility of 22.8%, while SCDV experienced 18.61%.
Which ETF is bigger: RFG or SCDV?
As of March 13, 2026, RFG holds $302.68 M in assets under management (AUM), while SCDV manages $135.55 M.
What sectors do the RFG and SCDV ETFs invest in?
RFG leans toward sectors like Industrials, Health Care and Information Technology. Meanwhile, SCDV focuses on Industrials, Health Care and Financials.
What are the top holdings of the RFG ETF and SCDV ETF?
RFG top holdings include HECLA MINING, MEDPACE HOLDINGS INC and AEROVIRONMENT. SCDV holds in its top three: ENSIGN GROUP, GILDAN ACTIVEWEAR and CURTISS WRIGHT.
Which ETF is more diversified: RFG or SCDV?
RFG holds 91 securities with 29.38% of its assets in the top 15. SCDV has 35 securities and a top 15 weight of 67.55%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
