RFGvsQMIDETF Comparison
VS
Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Growth ETF (RFG) belongs to the US Mid Cap Growth segment. WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Fund (QMID) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. RFG's top 3 sector exposures are Healthcare, Technology and Industrials. In contrast, QMID's top sector exposures are Technology, Healthcare and Industrials. RFG is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 0.38% for QMID. RFG is up 10.7% year-to-date (YTD) with +$3M in YTD flows. QMID performs worse with 7.74% YTD performance, and +$700K in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of RFG and QMID below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
RFG vs QMID performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/29/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | RFG QMID | -1.98%+6.28% | -0.27%+1.88% | +10.70%+7.74% | +11.87%+8.66% | +58.50%n/a | +24.35%n/a |
| Flows | RFG QMID | -$4M- | -$8M- | +$3M+$700K | -$8M+$704K | -$39M- | -$119M- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | RFG QMID | +18.77%+13.35% | +20.31%+14.64% | +20.71%n/a | +23.02%n/a |
| Max drawdown | RFG QMID | -13.52%-8.11% | -13.52%-10.70% | -26.58%n/a | -35.14%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | RFG QMID | 73d66d | 73d160d | 380dn/a | 836dn/a |
Trading data
RFG | QMID | |
Last sale 10/30/2026 at 1:30 PM | $56.72 | $30.18 |
| Previous close 10/29/2026 | $57.97 | $30.43 |
| Consolidated volume 10/29/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
RFG | QMID | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/30/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
RFG | QMID | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $56.72 | $30.18 |
| 1D performance | -2.16% | -0.80% |
| AuM | $321.93 M | $2.28 M |
| E/R | 0.35% | 0.38% |
Characteristics
RFG | QMID | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Invesco | WisdomTree |
| Benchmark | S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth Index | WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth MidCap Index |
| N° of holdings | 101 | 124 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 1, 2006 | January 25, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
RFG
USA
94.32%
Other
5.68%
QMID
USA
94.38%
Other
5.62%
Sectors
RFG
Healthcare
24.36%
Technology
20.75%
Industrials
18.58%
Non-Energy Materi.
8.21%
Finance
7.38%
Other
20.71%
QMID
Technology
21.34%
Healthcare
18.03%
Industrials
14.79%
Finance
13.74%
Consumer Services
9.93%
Other
22.16%
Advertisement
Diversification
RFG
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
29.28%
QMID
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
20.61%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of September 30, 2026
RFG
Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.
2.85%
Twilio, Inc.
2.29%
DigitalOcean Holdings, Inc.
2.20%
TechnipFMC plc
2.14%
Vicor Corp.
1.97%
Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
1.94%
Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.
1.93%
Medpace Holdings, Inc.
1.92%
InterDigital, Inc.
1.86%
Corcept Therapeutics, Inc.
1.78%
Five Below, Inc.
1.72%
Valaris Ltd.
1.70%
Carpenter Technology Corp.
1.66%
ATI, Inc.
1.66%
Woodward, Inc.
1.66%
QMID
Atlassian Corp.
2.26%
Tenet Healthcare Corp.
1.97%
Medpace Holdings, Inc.
1.45%
Nutanix, Inc.
1.43%
Everest Group Ltd.
1.32%
Toast, Inc.
1.32%
Permian Resources Corp.
1.32%
Dynatrace, Inc.
1.31%
Exelixis, Inc.
1.25%
Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc.
1.21%
TKO Group Holdings, Inc.
1.17%
RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd.
1.16%
Ralph Lauren Corp.
1.16%
Tyler Technologies, Inc.
1.15%
Somnigroup International, Inc.
1.14%
Frequently asked questions about RFG and QMID
How have the RFG and QMID ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 29, 2026, RFG is up 10.7% year-to-date (YTD), while QMID has returned 7.74%. That puts RFG better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: RFG or QMID?
Year-to-date, the RFG ETF saw +$3M in flows, compared to +$700K for QMID.
Which ETF is more volatile: RFG or QMID?
Over the past year, RFG had a volatility of 20.31%, while QMID experienced 14.64%.
Which ETF is bigger: RFG or QMID?
As of October 29, 2026, RFG holds $321.93 M in assets under management (AUM), while QMID manages $2.28 M.
What sectors do the RFG and QMID ETFs invest in?
RFG leans toward sectors like Healthcare, Technology and Industrials. Meanwhile, QMID focuses on Technology, Healthcare and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the RFG ETF and QMID ETF?
RFG top holdings include Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc., Twilio, Inc. and DigitalOcean Holdings, Inc.. QMID holds in its top three: Atlassian Corp., Tenet Healthcare Corp. and Medpace Holdings, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: RFG or QMID?
RFG holds 101 securities with 29.28% of its assets in the top 15. QMID has 124 securities and a top 15 weight of 20.61%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
